Bill O'Reilly Absolutely DESTROYS Young Leftist Activist Monica Novoa

Soros's groups including Media Matters and MoveOn.org launched a campaign last week against anyone who calls illegal immigration ‘illegal’ and attempting to categorize using the word illegal as a hate crime… their minions were all over the TV last Thursday and Friday, and some were not only obviously planted but unprepared and uncommitted:

Video: Bill O'Reilly Absolutely DESTROYS Young Leftist Activist Monica Novoa

Monica Novoa told O’Reilly she was a legal immigrant. But in 2000 she admitted her family crossed into California through a torn border fence, making Monica not only an  ignorant pawn but a liar and an illegal herself as well. 

See Latino Studies Become a Central Focus at CSUN:

Monica Novoa, 20, has been with CAUSA for three years and helped push for the new program. Her family left El Salvador in 1982, when federal troops were targeting teachers and other intellectuals for intimidation and slaughter.  Novoa said her father was a teacher and a leftist. When she was 3, coyotes--guides for undocumented immigrants--took the family through Guatemala, Mexico and a torn border fence into California.

Once he arrived in the United States, her father went to school to become an electrician. Her mother got into the real estate business. But like Barrios' parents, Novoa's family rarely discussed their experiences in El Salvador.

"Most of what I knew about El Salvador was from the popular music that I listened to," she said. "One of my favorite lines is from a Victor Jara song where he's saying: 'If the hands that work the soil are the people's, then why doesn't the harvest belong to those who work the land?' "

‘If You’re Right Wing, You’re a Hate Group’

Photo Credit: Stretchy Bill Creative Commons

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is in the business to raise money. In order to do this, they must extend the definition of what it means to be a “hate group.” It’s similar to the phrase “One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter.” It all depends on who’s defining the terms.

Each year the SPLC issues a report on hate groups in America. Each year the list gets longer. “Last week, the group released its latest intelligence report, titled ‘The Patriot Movement Explodes.’ The listing includes the Tenth Amendment Center, Oath Keepers and WND.”

The SPLC has gone from tracking the movements of violent racists, skinhead groups, and a brief resurgence of the KKK that number in the hundreds to creating hysteria over mainstream value voters. If you believe in the Tenth Amendment, you must be part of a hate group. If you say President Obama is wrong on this or that issue, then you must be responding out of racial hatred. Am I exaggerating? You be the judge from this report by Jack Minor at WND:

Mark Potek, senior fellow with the SPLC and editor of the report, said the growth of what is described as the radical right was fueled by “economic dislocation, a proliferation of demonizing conspiracy theories, the changing racial makeup of America, and the prospect of four more years under a black president who many on the far right view as an enemy to their country.”

With its new definition of what constitutes a hate group, the SPLC has become a fund-raising machine. It’s no wonder that the SPLC is flush with cash.[1] Ultimately, the tactic is to strike fear in middle-America so the checks keep rolling in. Most communities don’t see skinheads or even KKKers, so the SPLC needs new visible enemies.

According to the SPLC, hate has gone mainstream, so you better send a donation before these “haters” come and get you, too! The SPLC is a fund raising industry designed to silence conservatives who want their country back, to hold elected officials accountable to their Constitutional oath, and to uphold certain moral values. There’s not much money in fighting real hate groups now that only a few of the real haters are still around, so the SPLC needs a bigger, more menacing group of haters — your next door neighbors who attend the church down the street! Muslim extremists who kill soldiers in the name of Allah on an army base or plan to blow up the streets of New York City to kill and maim Americans are of little concern when there are bigger fish to land.

h/t to Western Journalism  -   Read More at godfatherpolitics.com

View debate: 'Is America a Christian nation?'

Watch to gain more confidence for moral standards

The secularists' attack on religious freedom, free speech, the sanctity of marriage, the sanctity of life, parental rights, private property and more is rooted in their claim that America is not a Christian nation, so, as they argue, Christian principles can't be part of our government.

A debate on the issue was sponsored last fall by a University of South Carolina group of atheists and agnostics. It's our opinion that the winner of the debate is American history and Christian values, represented by our friend E. Ray Moore, founder of Exodus Mandate, which is helping rescue children nationwide from immoral government schools.

Learn how to stand on a firm foundation for the moral values that serve all families and all Americans. View the debate segments now.

DEBATE: IS AMERICA A CHRISTIAN NATION?
1. OPENING STATEMENT (MOORE)
2. OPENING STATEMENT (MOORE / SILVERMAN)
3. OPENING STATEMENT (SILVERMAN)
4. REBUTTAL (MOORE)
5. REBUTTAL (SILVERMAN)
6. CROSS EXAMINATIONS
7. Q & A
8. CLOSING STATEMENT (MOORE)
9. CLOSING STATEMENT (SILVERMAN)

BACKGROUND
Is America a Christian nation? Was it ever?

by Reach Out Columbia, January 2010

That was the topic of a debate last October between E. Ray Moore, president of Frontline Ministries, and Herb Silverman, president of the Secular Coalition for America and professor at the College of Charleston. Sponsored by the Pastafarians, a USC student organization for atheists and agnostics, the event drew Christians and non-Christians alike to consider Moore’s defense of America's Christian foundation and Silverman's denial of it.

"My goal was to defend the well-documented historical and spiritual truths lived out by our Founding Fathers, proving that America was indeed founded as a Christian nation," Moore says. "Although our country has ceased to honor some of the biblical principles that informed its foundation, much of America's Christian heritage remains. These facts cannot be debated away."

Both men approached their podiums with considerable qualifications for the debate. Dr. Silverman serves on the boards of the American Humanist Association and Atheist Alliance International and has debated similar topics at Oxford University. Early in 2009, he advocated the concept of the "godless Constitution" with an opinion editorial in the Washington Post. Nineteen years previously, he successfully sued the State of South Carolina to remove its religious oath for civil office holders.

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29:2 NJKV

In my opinion, Moore definitely won this debate. And nowhere in either the Constitution or in anyone's "right or clear thinking" mind does it make sense to let less than 12% of the population, which includes all Atheists and Agnostics (who supposedly believe in God, but just don't want to have to follow any rules or go to Church... but always seem to call on Him in times of real emergencies), to make the rules or set the tone for the rest of us. Just like allowing in freedom of religion does not logically mean that every minority religious group has the right to come to American then tell the 80%+ of Americans what they can do... unless we let them.

Something to be remembered: "There are no Agnostics in foxholes". The problem is that by the time they wake up and get it, it will be too late for America as we know it.

The problems caused by Progressives using the Hate Crimes legislation, that was quietly attached to a defense spending bill against the will of the people... as usual with this administration, has already reared its ugly head in where else but California, by Muslims.

It will be used by Muslims, whose goal is to disrupt and overtake the way of life in America, unless sensible Americans and Christians, Jews and those of other sensible religions stand up and stand up now.

Source: SaveCalifornia.com

This is absolutely Beautiful !!!!!

Take a look: http://www.greatdanepro..com/Pray%20For%20America/index.htm

Related:

Christian Mayor Accused of "Hate Crime"

"Hate Crimes" Laws Used Against Christians in Canada

DC: Fenty Signs Multipurpose Emergency Crime Bill

Muslim Demographics

Protecting Pedophiles?

AP

During a House Judiciary Committee meeting on the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (which recently passed the House), Republican Congressman Steve King offered up an amendment to exclude pedophiles from being a protected category under the legislation.

Every single Democrat voted it down.

(If you remember from last week’s Hannity’s America, we reported Democratic Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz attacked Republican Congressman Tom Rooney for offering an amendment to include veterans as a protected class in the bill.)

Do you think pedophiles should be included in the hate crime bill?

by Web Producer – Sean Hannity

Do the American people really think pedophiles should be included in the hate crime bill?

Related Resources:

• Michael Farris - United Nation’s Convention on Rights of a Child Material
• 30 Ways in 30 Days to Save Your Family...

Posted: Daily Thought Pad

YouTube - Democrats Protect Pedophiles