Two: Hector Monsegur, one of the leaders of the LulzSac hacker movement, was identified and arrested last year by the FBI. Although he practiced good computer security and used an anonymous relay service to protect his identity, he slipped up.
And three: Paula Broadwell,who had an affair with CIA director David Petraeus, similarly took extensive precautions to hide her identity. She never logged in to her anonymous e-mail service from her home network. Instead, she used hotel and other public networks when she e-mailed him. The FBI correlated hotel registration data from several different hotels -- and hers was the common name.
The Internet is a surveillance state. Whether we admit it to ourselves or not, and whether we like it or not, we're being tracked all the time. Google tracks us, both on its pages and on other pages it has access to. Facebook does the same; it even tracks non-Facebook users. Apple tracks us on our iPhones and iPads. One reporter used a tool called Collusion to track who was tracking him; 105 companies tracked his Internet use during one 36-hour period.
Increasingly, what we do on the Internet is being combined with other data about us. Unmasking Broadwell's identity involved correlating her Internet activity with her hotel stays. Everything we do now involves computers, and computers produce data as a natural by-product. Everything is now being saved and correlated, and many big-data companies make money by building up intimate profiles of our lives from a variety of sources.
Facebook, for example, correlates your online behavior with your purchasing habits offline. And there's more. There's location data from your cell phone, there's a record of your movements from closed-circuit TVs.
This is ubiquitous surveillance: All of us being watched, all the time, and that data being stored forever. This is what a surveillance state looks like, and it's efficient beyond the wildest dreams of George Orwell.
Sure, we can take measures to prevent this. We can limit what we search on Google from our iPhones, and instead use computer web browsers that allow us to delete cookies. We can use an alias on Facebook. We can turn our cell phones off and spend cash. But increasingly, none of it matters.
There are simply too many ways to be tracked. The Internet, e-mail, cell phones, web browsers, social networking sites, search engines: these have become necessities, and it's fanciful to expect people to simply refuse to use them just because they don't like the spying, especially since the full extent of such spying is deliberately hidden from us and there are few alternatives being marketed by companies that don't spy.
This isn't something the free market can fix. We consumers have no choice in the matter. All the major companies that provide us with Internet services are interested in tracking us. Visit a website and it will almost certainly know who you are; there are lots of ways to be tracked without cookies.
Cellphone companies routinely undo the web's privacy protection. One experiment at Carnegie Mellon took real-time videos of students on campus and was able to identify one-third of them by comparing their photos with publicly available tagged Facebook photos.
Maintaining privacy on the Internet is nearly impossible. If you forget even once to enable your protections, or click on the wrong link, or type the wrong thing, and you've permanently attached your name to whatever anonymous service you're using. Monsegur slipped up once, and the FBI got him. If the director of the CIA can't maintain his privacy on the Internet, we've got no hope.
In today's world, governments and corporations are working together to keep things that way.
Governments are happy to use the data corporations collect -- occasionally demanding that they collect more and save it longer -- to spy on us. And corporations are happy to buy data from governments. Together the powerful spy on the powerless, and they're not going to give up their positions of power, despite what the people want.
Fixing this requires strong government will, but they're just as punch-drunk on data as the corporations. Slap-on-the-wrist fines notwithstanding, no one is agitating for better privacy laws.
So, we're done. Welcome to a world where Google knows exactly what sort of porn you all like, and more about your interests than your spouse does. Welcome to a world where your cell phone company knows exactly where you are all the time. Welcome to the end of private conversations, because increasingly your conversations are conducted by e-mail, text, or social networking sites.
And welcome to a world where all of this, and everything else that you do or is done on a computer, is saved, correlated, studied, passed around from company to company without your knowledge or consent; and where the government accesses it at will without a warrant.
Welcome to an Internet without privacy, and we've ended up here with hardly a fight. - CNN
Google’s new streamlined policy will enable the Internet’s most powerful company to dig even deeper into the lives of its more than 1 billion users.
Google says the changes will make it easier for consumers to understand how it collects personal information, and allow the company to create more helpful and compelling services. Critics argue that Google is trampling on people’s privacy rights in its relentless drive to sell more ads.
The Daily Mail reports Google saying that to delay implementation, as many have called for, “would cause confusion.” Google said in a blog post:
If you’re signed in to Google, you expect our products to work really beautifully together. For example, if you’re working on Google Docs and you want to share it with someone on Gmail, you want their email right there ready to use. Our privacy policies have always allowed us to combine information from different products with your account — effectively using your data to provide you with a better service. However, we’ve been restricted in our ability to combine your YouTube and Search histories with other information in your account. Our new Privacy Policy gets rid of those inconsistencies so we can make more of your information available to you when using Google.
The new policy doesn’t change any existing privacy settings or how any personal information is shared outside of Google. We aren’t collecting any new or additional information about users. We won’t be selling your personal data. And we will continue to employ industry-leading security to keep your information safe.
If you don’t think information sharing will improve your experience, you can use our privacy tools to do things like edit or turn off your search history and YouTube history, control the way Google tailors ads to your interests and browse the web “incognito” using Chrome. You can use services like Search, Maps and YouTube if you are not signed in. You can even separate your information into different accounts, since we don’t combine personal information across them. And we’re committed to data liberation, so if you want to take your information elsewhere you can.
Here’s a look at some of the key issues to consider as Google tries to learn about you.
Q: How will Google’s privacy changes affect users?
A: Google Inc. is combining more than 60 different privacy policies so it will be able to throw all the data it gathers about each of its logged-in users into personal dossiers. The information Google learns about you while you enter requests into its search engine can be culled to suggest videos to watch when you visit the company’s YouTube site.
Users who write a memo on Google’s online word processing program, Docs, might be alerted to the misspelling of the name of a friend or co-worker a user has communicated with on Google’s Gmail. The new policy pools information from all Google-operated services, empowering the company to connect the dots from one service to the next.
Q: Why is Google making these changes?
A: The company, based in Mountain View, Calif., says it is striving for a “beautifully simple, intuitive user experience across Google.” What Google hasn’t spent much time talking about is how being able to draw more revealing profiles about its users will help sell advertising – the main source of its $38 billion in annual revenue.
One reason Google has become such a big advertising network: Its search engine analyzes requests to figure out which people are more likely to be interested in marketing pitches about specific products and services. Targeting the ads to the right audience is crucial because in many cases, Google only gets paid when someone clicks on an ad link. And, of course, advertisers tend to spend more money if Google is bringing them more customers.
Q: Is there a way to prevent Google from combining the personal data it collects from all its services?
A: No, not if you’re a registered user of Gmail, Google Plus, YouTube, or other Google products. But you can minimize the data Google gathers. For starters, make sure you aren‘t logged into one of Google’s services when you‘re using Google’s search engine, watching a YouTube video or perusing pictures on Picasa. You can get a broad overview of what Google knows about you at http://www.google.com/dashboard , where a Google account login is required. Google also offers the option to delete users’ history of search activity.
It‘s important to keep in mind that Google can still track you even when you’re not logged in to one of its services. But the information isn‘t quite as revealing because Google doesn’t track you by name, only through a numeric Internet address attached to your computer or an alphanumeric string attached to your Web browser.
Q: Are all Google services covered by the privacy policy?
A: No, a few products, such as Google’s Chrome Web browser and mobile payment processor Wallet, will still be governed by separate privacy policies.
Q: Is Google’s new privacy policy legal?
A: The company has no doubt about it. That‘s why it’s repeatedly rebuffed pleas to delay the changes since announcing the planned revisions five weeks ago. But privacy activists and even some legal authorities have several concerns.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, a privacy rights group, sued the FTC in a federal court in an effort to force the FTC to exercise its powers and block Google’s privacy changes. A federal judge ruled the courts didn’t have the authority to tell the FTC how to regulate Google. The FTC says it is always looking for evidence that one of its consent orders has been violated.
Earlier this week, the French regulatory agency CNIL warned Google CEO Larry Page that the new policy appears to violate the European Union’s strict data-protection rules. Last week, 36 attorneys general in the U.S. and its territories derided the new policy as an “invasion of privacy” in a letter to Page.
One of the major gripes is that registered Google users aren’t being given an option to consent to, or reject, the changes, given that they developed their dependence on the services under different rules. In particular, people who bought smartphones running on Google’s Android software, and signed two-year contracts to use the devices, may have a tough time avoiding the new privacy policy. They could switch to non-Google services, but those typically don’t work as well on Android software. Or they could buy a different smartphone and pay an early-termination penalty.
Q: What regulatory power do government agencies have to change or amend the privacy changes?
A: The U.S. Federal Trade Commission gained greater oversight over Google’s handling of personal information as part of a settlement reached last year. Google submitted to the agreement after exposing its users email contacts when it launched a now-defunct social networking service called Buzz in 2010. The consent order requires Google’s handling of personal information to be audited every other year and forbids misleading or deceptive privacy changes.
Google met with the FTC before announcing the privacy changes. Neither the company nor the FTC has disclosed whether Google satisfied regulators that the revisions comply with the consent order.
It is hard to believe that twenty years ago, the Internet as we as we know it today did not exist. Yes, there was an Internet, but the World Wide Web did not exist. Imagine life today without the web? We do business over the Internet. We get our news from the Internet. The Internet has been the greatest innovation for free speech since the printing press.
Now this great innovation of free speech is under threat. What is the threat and where is it coming from?
All this year, through December, the World Conference on International Telecommunications is meeting with the purpose of negotiating a new treaty to govern international telecommunications.
Russia and China are using this as an excuse to demand a lesser role for the United States in governing the Internet. They would like the United Nations to control the Internet. Other states, such as Brazil and South Africa have demanded the creation of a new global body to control the Internet.
At the same time, China, Russia, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have called for a code of conduct for the Internet that would govern activities on the Internet. Some of them are no brainers. Some of them include no criminal activities and not using the Internet as a tool of war.
Section C of the “Code of Conduct” should set off all of the alarm bells. It reads:
(c) To cooperate in combating criminal and terrorist activities that use
information and communications technologies, including networks, and in curbing the dissemination of information that incites terrorism, secessionism or extremism or that undermines other countries’ political, economic and social stability, as well as their spiritual and cultural environment;
Let’s see, this is coming from four of the most repressive nations in the world and they think the Internet should be controlled so that it does not undermine “political” or “social” stability. Aren’t those the code words they use to persecute those who dissent from their regimes?
The Russians, Chinese and the third world object that the United States has so much control over the Internet.
Too damn bad. We created it.
The good news here is that this is a treaty. Under the Constitution, the Senate must ratify a treaty and that takes a 2/3 vote. That is unlikely to happen.
Unfortunately Obama has the same respect for free speech as does the leadership of Russia or China and that is alarming. If an agreement or treaty is bad for America, Obama is for it. If you doubt that, look at some of the other treaties he has signed, such as the START treaty.
The Internet is an invaluable tool for freedom. Without the Internet, we would have been hard pressed to get the Tea Party movement started. This is one instance where we cannot play catch up after the Obama regime has already signed a bad treaty.
We must stay in touch with our Senators and Congressmen to make certain they stay on the Obama regime and keep them from agreeing to a deal that would destroy the freedom we have on the Internet.
Even if you're one of those luddites who uses Google only for Search – not the increasingly random assemblage of first-generation SaaS apps that make up its unintentionally eclectic portfolio – you're sure to already be sick of the sticky pop-ups Google has been using to warn customers it is unifying all the services under one comprehensive lack-of-privacy policy.
Google announced in January it would unify most of its services under a single privacy policy and a single set of data-gathering tools that will arrange all Google's useful data on each of its customers in an efficient database, from which it is much simpler to sell that customer as a commodity to advertisers looking for specific patterns of behavior.
The change actually goes into effect March 1.
Before it does, if you're cautious at all about the amount of information Google has about you, uncertain at all how little evil Google will do with all the consolidated information or just a little woogy about anyone having big chunks of surveillance on you with a yen to sell it: go erase your Google history now.
Thanks to the Electronic Frontier Foundation for pointing out that having decent security and using it are not the same thing.
Tomorrow, after all your odd searches, secret obsessions and kinky lunch reading is ensconced inside a special database, you won't be able to get to the data any more.
You can delete much of the data Google has on you, though. At least as long as you remember to clear your browser history.
Not the one you always clear before leaving your desk and risking having prying co-workers come look at your cache to figure out what the audio-streamed screams coming from your computer earlier in the day were all about.
The history you have to delete is on Google.com. When you're signed in, Google keeps track of where you're going and what you're looking at, and stores that history on its server files.
Today only you can still delete that data, by following the instructions provided by EFF.
That's it. History is a toggle, so once you turn it off it should stay that way until you reactivate it.
It's not a big procedure, or a complex one. It is one chance more than any other online vendor has offered you lately to restrict your private data a little.
Scroogle - a not-for-profit search engine that offered users something of a pro-privacy antidote to Google - has been killed... Daniel Brandt (its creator), called it quits after his servers were repeatedly targeted by DDoS attacks on Scroogle. (NOT) Google to once again attempt to banish the site from the interwebs, but.... a number of DDoS attacks that hit Scroogle, rendering the site utterly useless. “Scroogle.org is gone forever,” Brandt told BetaBeat. “Even if all my DDoS problems had never started in December, Scroogle was already getting squeezed from Google’s throttling, (DATE SORT) and was already dying. It might have...
Also…
Earlier today I saw a headline about a search engine that was deleted. Maybe this is how we will all be tracked – delete the other search engines or as in the text below, you can search, but you can’t open the links from the search.
NZ really is the TESTING GROUNDS for the NWO.... At this time, I have used an international SIM modem to access GLP, as ALL NON-GOOGLE WEBSITES HAVE BEEN BLOCKED IN NEW ZEALAND!!!!!!! I called my ISP, who stated that they are having the same issue, although they are on a different provider in the office. (Ironic that my ISP doesnt use its own services...)
This is what's up>
You ARE able to access ALL GOOGLE services!!! -Gmail -Youtube -Search -+ -ETC
You are completely UNABLE to access ANY NON-GOOGLE SITES. ****YOU CAN SEARCH FOR INFO NO PROBLEM, BUT CANNOT OPEN THE PAGES FROM THE SEARCH!!!!**** "Internet explorer cannot open the web page" Same thing on al my PC's and my Mac, all my mates have reported the same thing, they are all in Auckland though, so this may just be citywide. ---This is affecting ALL ISPs!!!!
1. they will shut down conservative sites fast and furiously 2. If it passes, which with the current GOP leadership, is almost certain, flood the DOJ with complaints against left wing sites - FLOOD THEM! Do not coordinate this because the DOJ would then be able to disregard them with little effort. Every complaint should be different in form, substance, timing and target. Tie up the DOJ. Make the commies careful what they wish for.
Lawmakers in Washington are well known for using the calendar to sneak past the American voters political decisions certain to be unpopular. Take the holiday season, for example, when we’re all preoccupied with events completely unrelated to politics. According to attorney Gary Kreep, President of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF), this season is no different, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) is preparing to fast track through the Senate a bill that has Constitutionalists like Kreep very concerned. Now, after learning from his Washington insiders that Reid has planned a snap final vote on the Senate version of...
Full Article:
Lawmakers in Washington are well known for using the calendar to sneak past the American voters political decisions certain to be unpopular. Take the holiday season, for example, when we’re all preoccupied with events completely unrelated to politics.
According to attorney Gary Kreep, President of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF), this season is no different, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) is preparing to fast track through the Senate a bill that has Constitutionalists like Kreep very concerned.
Last week, Kreep was already on his toes, sending red-alert announcements about House Bill H.R. 3261 that would allow the Department of Justice to essentially investigate and prosecute those who are “dishonest” on the Internet—a power Kreep argues is “ripe for government abuse.”
Now, after learning from his Washington insiders that Reid has planned a snap final vote on the Senate version of this bill immediately upon returning from holiday break, Kreep has shifted his Paul Revere warning run into overdrive. He explains: “This bill (S. 968) is disguised as a measure to stop online piracy. However, there are already plenty of laws on the books to protect copyrighted material on the Internet. This is an Internet takeover bill, pure and simple.
This measure will give Eric Holder and Barack Hussein Obama the power to ‘police’ the Internet, “sanitize” web searches and shut down anti-Obama websites.
Just one ‘complaint’ from a liberal activist, or a government agent, that you are indirectly violating an obscure copyright rule, and your website could be fined huge sums, and it could be blacklisted. Meanwhile, the left-wing mainstream media companies are campaigning all out for this bill, too. They want the government to shut down all the blogs, political forums, and independent news sites, so that they, once again, have a monopoly on the news you and I are allowed to see.”
So, how can this bill, so ominous in its potential, be on the verge of becoming law? What’s next and how should we respond? Get to the bottom of this serious issue with Gary Kreep. Call Special Guests to book him for a supercharged interview. VISIT THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATION AT:
ABOUT GARY KREEP: A 1972 graduate of the University of California at San Diego with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics, Mr. Kreep graduated from the University of San Diego School of Law in 1975 with a Juris Doctor. He passed the California State Bar Examination on his first try, and started practicing law in 1975.
He has been in private practice since that time, both as a sole practitioner and as the sole owner of a small law firm, employing as many as three attorneys and ten staff members. Mr. Kreep co-founded the UNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATION (USJF) in 1979 with two other California attorneys. Since that time, he has served as the President and Executive Director of USJF.
In 1992, Mr. Kreep reduced his private practice to part-time status to work full-time for USJF. USJF is a nationwide, nonprofit, conservative, legal action foundation. Mr. Kreep co-founded the JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (JPAC) in 1985 with two other conservative activists. He has served as President of JPAC since then. JPAC is a federal political action committee registered with the Federal Election Commission.
Mr. Kreep co-founded the CALIFORNIA JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (CALJPAC) in 1996 with two other conservative activists. He has served as President of CALJPAC since then. CALJPAC is a California political action committee registered with the California FPPC.
Mr. Kreep co-founded the FAMILY VALUES COALITION in 1998 with two other conservative activists. He has served as President of FVC since then. FVC is a nonprofit California corporation organized under IRC 501 (c)(4).
Mr. Kreep currently serves as General Counsel to the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, an unpaid position.
Political/Civic: Mr. Kreep served on the California Delegations to the 1976 and 1980 Republican National Conventions. He has been a member of a number of Republican organizations, including several California Republican Assembly Chapters. Mr. Kreep also served as elected General Counsel to Region 16 of the Young Republican National Foundation, and General Counsel to the California Young Republicans.
Mr. Kreep served for one year on the San Diego County, California PUBLIC WELFARE ADVISORY BOARD (PWAB). PWAB is an advisory board to the San Diego County Board of Supervisors concerning the San Diego County Department of Social Services. Mr. Kreep served for two years on the SAN DIEGO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION (HRC). HRC is an advisory board to the San Diego City Council, charged with the task of enforcing the San Diego City non-discrimination ordinances, including its gay rights ordinance. Mr. Kreep was a member from 1969 until 1984 of YOUNG AMERICANS FOR FREEDOM (YAF). He served as San Diego County Chairman, California State Vice-Chairman, California State Chairman, and a Member of the National Board of Directors of YAF. Mr. Kreep served in the BIG BROTHER Program for four years.
Legal: Mr. Kreep is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the United States Federal Court for the Eastern District of California, the United States Federal Court for the Northern District of California, the United States Federal Court for the Central District of California, the United States Federal Court for the Southern District of California, and all state courts in California. He is also admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and for the Sixth Circuit.
Published Articles/Radio and Television Appearances: Mr. Kreep has written a number of articles published by a variety of newspapers and other publications. This includes the San Diego Union Tribune, the Escondido Times Advocate, the North County Times, the Christian American, the Arizona Star, Media Bypass, and many more. Mr. Kreep regularly appears on a variety of radio and television programs. These include radio programs such as the ROGER HEDGECOCK SHOW, the WEISSBACH SHOW, ISSUES IN EDUCATION, the MASON WEAVER SHOW, the BOB NOONAN SHOW, the DUFFY SHOW, and the MICHAEL LAW SHOW.
Please Call You Congressman and tell them… “NO MORE”!
A republic destroyed!
A Republic sabotaged by 14th Amendment, the RED AMENDMET: Part 1.
Ever wonder why the nation is in the fix that it is? Is it the result of political ignorance, not remembering, not consulting the nations history, or is it by design and as a concept, given premier social engineering?
Take a look and view, the 14th Amendment and come to the realization of what the crux of the problem really is. For generations since the Civil War, we the people have been sabotaged by the government employees, ("as Senator McCain can be quoted as saying: [" I am a government employee"] )
What kind of government do we have?
As the fictional character Morpheus, the “Matrix” once stated-
“I’m trying to free your mind, Neo. But, I can only show you the door-You’re the one who has to walk through it.” (So true of all of us and because of that failing to walk through the door thus seeking further knowledge, we become enslaved through generational acceptance of lies and extortion.)
And so here we are, information is available and, be it right, wrong or indifferent, we have to be able to discern a given element of particulars in order to understand truth of fact, versus fiction or conspiracy theory. We must ask ourselves a very serious question: Has our awareness been lulled as to assume that we are secure within our government, or in fact, have we been given a “false” sense of security, living under a false flag?
As in our case, there are two types of government, 1. de facto and 2. de jure.
As in government, de facto, is not according to law while, de jure is according to law.
As per Black’s Law Dictionary: Sixth Edition Deluxe.
DE FACTO: In fact (should actually be of fact), is distinguished from “de jure,” by right.
De Jure: By right; by lawful right; rightfully ‘ complying with the law in all respects; valid in law (i.e. constitutional; in conformity with the law of nations)
P 1
We are often speaking in terms of, “think outside of the box”, in other words, we need to think differently, or from a different perspective, not as we are or have been programmed to think. We must be able to discern truth
from false programming as it is quite factual, we are programmed from day one of our lives, and as we mature and enter the stage of politics, we are programmed to digest every and any thing that the government, “De Facto” government, throws our way. Think of it as control.
Staying in the box of a programmed society causes, in many cases, severe abnormalities such as tunnel vision. In order to explore the other side of life, we need to reprogram ourselves by opening our minds and asking such question as-“what if?” What if things are actually not what we are led to believe them to be. We, in order to be a free people, have got to be able to think like a free people and therefore have the fortitude to question authority. There are always two sides to any issue when it comes to government, that is “they”, “them”, and “us”, we,
the people. It is always a case, just as it is with the police, as an example and used frequently as, “them and us”, which in that case, we are the them and the police are the us.
When it comes to living within the confines of a controlling government, we become enslaved and that enslavement all too often is malevolent and inflicted in a stealth like manner, much like the much touted but rebuked National Health Care bill. We are now witnessing the effects of social programming as administered in the don’t ask don’t tell mind set installed within our military and the programming of our young people within the education system. Government working in stealth is a government that burdens us with ramifications that comes a time, we have to deal with, like it or not. There are those who wish or do not understand why they should think outside of the box, and then there are those, hopefully those being us, as in “us and them”, who are willing to question and deal with the ramifications that are planned for us. There are many weapons used to gain and hold control over a people, one seldom given consideration and challenged is that of “Legal Language”. Legal Language is the tool that has been utilized to usurp your natural, unalienable, and constitutional rights.
We have to come to an understanding, and one that will be revealed if we think and start to live outside of the proverbial box that Legal Language has provided the vehicle through which we have not been living under the true Constitution that was established by the founding fathers. In exploring Legal Language, we can come to understand that we have not, and are not living under what we assume to be a free state as we have been conditioned or programmed to believe or told as being a free state. Hopefully, we can discover truth from fiction as to whether we have been misled or not. It is obvious that for the most part, Americans awareness has been lulled and therefore are incognizant of what has really happened within our learning and application thereof.
P 2
We as a people of this great nation are finding ourselves in a severe case of “Dire Straits” and it is necessary for us to find out what the new “Political Situation” really is. We must gain the necessary information that will assist in emancipating ourselves from an unwitting servitude. With out proper and understandable available information for our emancipation as free borne Americans, we will not gain our true freedom, or better yet, unalienable rights. This emancipation process comes from the pursuance of the Law of Nations; by which, such status is protected by what is to be referred to as the "organic" Constitution. To paraphrase Morpheus, “the Matrix”, with out knowing the path, we cannot walk the path.
ARE WE IN A DILEMMA? CAN WE OUTLINE THE DILEMMA?
In order to think out side off the box of political control and dominance, we have got to give consideration to a conspiracy, a conspiracy that is factual rather than theoretical. Of all the conspiracies that we have been faced with of recent, Obama’s “birth certificate/ineligibility…”, “Operation Fast and Furious”, “open borders” and not so recent, “The War on Drugs-on going”, “911”, “The Branch Davidian Massacre, Waco Texas”, “President Kennedy Assassination” and others too numerous to mention. There remains one conspiracy more evil than any other that we, the United States of America have ever seen. This conspiracy is the termination of the organic Constitution and since the Civil War, the “Reconstruction Era”, the incorporation of the United States of America and the nullification, so to say of states sovereignty.
Since 9 July 1868, one of the greatest conspiracies ever bestowed upon the United States has probably been more distasteful, stellar influences ever experienced upon our individual sovereignty and freedoms as natural born citizens to this “once great nation.” This conspiracy is in plain sight for all to see as all are living in it but few will have the courage to think outside of the box to explore and question with resolve the most evil conspiracy yet experienced. With the exception of a few two legged persons, once something is killed or dead, it is diminished forever. Let’s hope that is not the case if enough of us plant the seed to think outside of the box.
By exploring section 4 of the 14 Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and understanding the issue of public debt of the United States and slaves we should come away with a complete understanding of the conspiracy of this nations intended death. Exploring beyond section1 of the 14 Amendment is seldom if ever heard of by the common person, in the circles of law perhaps but even then, ignored. By going beyond the 1st section of 14, that is where the evil of the 14 Amendment lies and are those issues that are truly unconscionable and wicked.
P 3
There is dual reference to the 14th Amendment, which are:
It was / is a vehicle for the implementation of Communism in America. America being the biggest challenge to the Communist cabalists, the Cold War was just one phase of distraction for the public to focus on while Communism is much older and started its conquest many years before the cold war. Think, the “Great Depression” as one vehicle of destruction.
It was / is a vehicle to deliberately bring the United States into perpetual debt. (Does that sound familiar by today’s standards?)
The first item of this conspiracy was necessarily designed and implemented in order to bring about the 2nd part of the vehicle to hell.
This nation experienced two wars in its birthing, one was the ever famous Revolutionary War which put us on the road to freedom, and the second was the war of 1812 which again was a war with the British Empire which is most famous for the burning of our capitol, Washington D.C. It was after the war of 1812 when the sinister covert forces of the “World Elite” who will be referred as the “they” syndrome as afore mentioned, also inferred to as the “Order”. The Order can also be referred to mean the “New World Order” and as, if you will remember when President George Bush Sr. brought the title New World Order into play during “Desert Storm”. That proclamation brought me up off of the couch! None the less, this will prove to a minimum the evil, covert takeover of the United States of America.
Illuminati / Masonry
This could be offensive to some as it was to me, but study proves out and opinions change.
There is a great to do over secrete societies such as the Illuminati and Masonry, or the Skull and Bones, coupled with the Bilderberg Group and or the Council on Foreign Relations. We are witness of take over by secrete societies, otherwise referred to as “puppets”, and Mainly of the Masonic Order. Offensive to some? But of course, was to me as a Mason, until I took a step outside of the box and started to question authority. The harm instilled is that of the rank and file of these subversive fraternities or secrete confederacies if you will. Just as the rank and file feed on the bile spewed from the international heads.
As a result of homage and symbolism, their presence is well known and advertised as printed on the various denominations of the Federal Reserve Notes; Notes of Debt. There are such symbols that have to be taken into consideration and further study.
P 4
Consider: There are many theories, but consider one for example.
The pyramid with the eerie illuminated eye, and The Great seal of the “United States”
One should also consult a text on symbolism as well. *There is much speculation that Washington D.C. was laid out to be a giant clandestine Masonic play ground, where many other symbolisms can be found.
One of the most intriguing of these symbolisms is the Washington Monument. The monument that you see is 555 feet tall. The sub-structure of the Monument is 20 percent of 555; or 111 feet. Add the two together and you get 666; the Mark of the Beast as mentioned in the Bible. Coincidental: Perhaps…but highly doubtful. (Is this coincidental or by design?) This positions America as being Neo-Babylon: The New World Order, i.e. The Order. *(Taken directly from the text, The Red Amendment)
Patriotism Directed to Military
As the United States holds dominance in world power and enjoys the act of nation building by spreading “democracy” (watch that word-democracy) that power of dominance has to be initiated and advanced by some means of a force of mass. Thus enters the United States military in initiating world dominance of power. Yes, we do have the world’s best fighting force but in today’s language, much misapplied. War, not only from a Patriotic point of view but as viewed from that of a sporting event as in team competition. i.e. our special forces our do their special forces, and that not to take away from our special forces but only to demonstrate a similarity as in the Marines being better or worse than the Army sort of thing. Fact is, this condition is directly related to patriotism, and that in its self generates a mentality of self righteous superiority to aggress or to be misapplied as in the bombing of other sovereignties or nations such as Libya, and that is not to say that Libya is a problematic nation as far as the west is concerned, but it is commonly agreed that we do not have any business bombing Libya with out a reason for a declaration of war. Much the same of course can be made for other past and present incursion / invasions for the sake of spreading that most misused word, “democracy”.
These same demonstrations were used by many nefarious dictators, such as Hitler for example to promote a reason. Any excuse is a good excuse as long as it is sellable and gives the appearance of being “Patriotic”. There are two standards as associated with a war or conflict.
P 5
Patriot:
1) One who loves, supports, and defends one’s country.
2) One who serves or works merely for monetary gain; a hireling. (a). A professional soldier hired for service in a foreign army.
There are also two types of Patriots, one who as a Patriot for duty and honor becomes a member of the nations military, and one, a civilian who either was a member of the nations military and becomes a civilian or the civilian who was never in the nations military but stands ready as a defender of the nation willing to meet all enemies foreign and domestic. All too often since WWII has the United States involved itself in police actions, some under the authority of the United Nations, and others at the behest of, perhaps nation building for future gain, but none which can definitely be classified as in defense of the United States; especially while allowing an invasion of criminally illegal and clandestine person’s to stampede across our southern border.
When it comes to the Constitution, Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress has the power to raise and support Armies, but no appropriation of money that use shall be for a longer term than two years. Actually, there is no reason for the United States to sustain a standing Army, Navy, or Air Force. This of course has been common practice since the Civil War. In the involvement of on going foreign conflicts past and present since WWII, would not the United States be considered a foreign entity in these areas of conflict either initiated by the U.S. or other nations? Wouldn’t this then classify the United States as a mercenary force. Now, enters the financiers and the Military/Industrial complex. As is too often the case being, ”it takes money to make money.” From what can be considered covert theft and slave labor, we are able to make reason for the being of the 14th Amendment. There is a term known as the Quiet War on Americans. The “Blueprint” used to create this dominance was-and is-entitled: Communism.
Neo-Slavery:
Neo-Slavery, never heard of it until now and as engendered by the 14th Amendment. “Wars and rebellions are, the two most mortal diseases of society.
P 6
Alexander Hamilton
Debt; a virulent product of war, couple that with Social Programs and debt is the primary crippler of a nation, our nation, the United States of America. Just think about the "Cut, Cap, and Trade
debat that is going on today, a push me, pull me syndrome. There should be nothing to debate on this issue, debt is death and that is final. As a result of debt, loans are arranged and those arrangements have to be made through the interfacing of the World Banks, the World Elite, and that being a paid political doctrine otherwise known as Communism. Now, we come to learn and understand a, not in our normal language, but the new America, the term “State”, not as in Ohio, New Mexico, Oregon…. but as in the context of the United States as a nation. We end up with an “economic slave force” under the banner of “The State”.
The State, to state it as in a Communist form of meaning.
Ballentine’s Law Dictionary defines Communism as:
Communism: In the pristine sense, is the ownership of the means of production by the community, each member of the community participating in production according to his ability and sharing in the products according to his need.
In common usage of the present day suggestive, of the theories of Marx, Lenin, politics, and authoritarian rule.
There are numerous expressions of the title Communism/Communist as: Democracy, Socialism, Liberalism, Fascism, and of course Progressive. As Progressive is basically a new term and heavily used by conservative talk hosts and now having entered the mainstream of the public vocabulary, these terms are constantly altered or revised as a deviation from the original meaning, that being Communist. As in the case of Progressive, that was touted as being one who was thinking out of the box and perhaps using imagineering as a useful tool for the sake of good for all concerned. Regardless as to how the language is contrived in order to establish a new moniker for Communism, it will still fall under the contrivance of Carl Marx and Fredrick Engel’s as in the “Communist Manifesto”. The purpose of the Communist Manifesto as a blue print is to enslave and control nations with a perpetual debt while creating personal debt through materialism.
P 7
Materialism has been one source of social diversion from all issues of a political nature, which in turn will alter any semblance of a free life style while control is being implemented through stealth management. In reviewing the “Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto”, one can easily see in parallel as to what has and is happening to the United States of America. Stealth management is the product applied for enslavement of the taxpayer in order to satisfy a none-satisfiable, national debt as well as being applied through out the world as a means of world dominance under Communism.
Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto:
1. Abolition of property in land and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. CONFISCATION OF THE PROPERTY OF ALL EMIGRANTS AND REBELS.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State.
6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State. (Think executive orders)
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State. 8. Equal liability of all to labor. The establishment of industrial armies; especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country. (Think-an executive order by pres. Nixon)
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
In thinking about how far the Progressive footprint has made it thus fare, as in the political arena, is there a representation of anything that has occurred to date? Are there parallels that are relevant today? There are many questions that could be asked in order to confirm a parallel between the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto and our activities such as subsidies, either agricultural, or industrial, public transportation i.e. Amtrak, Interstate Highways, Aviation subsidies, Utilities, and above all others, the Federal Reserve Bank and debtor notes as printed by the Federal Reserve which have nothing tangible for backing other than the promise of the tax payer.
P 8
Education can not be dismissed as in the fact that as in public schools religion can not be expressed, with exception of Islam perhaps, and evolution can be taught while history, nationalism is debunked or rendered as a negative and in the states, many do not teach state history but opt for cultural studies of either Latin, or Islam.
Controlled:
Now, let's move into the realm of "Control". Control, the ultimate goal of any totalitarian unit in command, or assuming command by what ever means. Bottom line is to gain control and maintain control for the sake of dominance of one over another. We are quite well aware of the fact that the government, the state, has had and does have control over the schools. So, enters "Neo-Slavery". A simple question, "Neo-Slavery", what is it? Neo-Slavery in our time, a new slave type which is very real and applicable and would be that form of slavery that replaced the slavery of a given race, the black African race which was in effect prior to the end of the Civil War, where at the end of the war and through the establishment of the 14 th Amendment, the new, or "Neo-Slavery" came into being, and that slavery shifted the blacks from private ownership to federal ownership. Along with the "Neo- Slavery" transitioning the black slave from private ownership to federal ownership also included all other races, the whites, browns, reds and the yellow races, otherwise known as and classified as "citizens", all of those Americans who were brought into the Union state as mandated tax payers, and obligators of federal law. This was the beginning of the end for states of independent nations status, and the loss of their sovereignty and now under federal control, not the Republic as in terms of which we like to think ourselves as being under. More on that later.
Neo-Slavery can only be initiated through, the "dummying down", "conditioning" process that we are just now understanding as being a reality, and starting very early in our schools. Another term to apply to this gradual yielding to control would be the utilization of "mind control". As and if you do remember the sudden shift in the social structure of the 60's; once women started exercising their independence as in throwing away the bra, no make up, and most pronounced since WWII, entering the work force. Independence in personality, and desires, are not all bad for anybody, other than those reasons of and for the Controllers, but there was a more sinister reason for encouraging the woman to enter the work force as part of the wage earner status, and that is the added revenue to the federal government as in, increasing the tax base. The feds can't get a piece of the female population if they are home raising their children? Therefore, women must be working. To further the plot of this silent Neo-Slavery, get people hooked on materialism and overspending, thus creating and increasing personal debt.
P 9
Who hasn't been in or are in debt? Debt, has been an institutional way of life in America. The media, as we know the media has not been at all honest with we the people, it is a programmed unit of information which has been an excellent vehicle for the promotion of free love and immorality. Thinking, is not out of line in terms of the subliminal control that the federal government has over religion, and that is through the granting of "501 c3 non profit status" from the Internal Revenue Service, chances are and to some extent, your beliefs are being covertly controlled through government laid "political speech". This is most prevalent in today's events. This scenario also plays into the applying for and acceptance of government grants. If the Mafia does you a favor, then you will be expected to repay that favor with a favor; no questions asked. This is a most dangerous element of our policing departments.
The greatest tool used by the Elite, are the people of the labor force. These people have been sucked into the plot of the Elite. This is where the ideology of a people being engaged in a battle against the "Capitalist". The labor movement has and is being used as a tool that is very subversive in design to harass the middle class owned businesses. How you say? Our most recent uprisings as demonstrated in Wisconsin, and Minnesota for example. This is nothing new, as the labor movement, not only in today's events but in the early 20th Century, has been captive of the Communist element as during the very early days of the 20th Century, the minority workers as well as the skilled trades has been severely influenced to have disregard for "Capitalism". That the capitalist mind set is totally against the middle class and is the thief and enemy of the working middle class. Any person(s) desirous of being in business for them selves becomes a Capitalist. Investing in stocks and bonds makes you a Capitalist. Capitalism causes growth and enhanced economics for all. Greed, and Communism destroys Capitalism.
In order for we the people to survive as a free republic, we must study, and learn about how engrained the Communist element is within our government and social structure. We must think outside the "Marxist box" that has been built around all of us either as individuals or groups. Most people in America are working full time jobs where we have middle class husband and wife. People should not be burdened to the point where life is all work. Accordingly, this gives little time to spend with family and other pleasures of life. An immediate cause of this epidemic is over taxation, and that is due to the "Neo-Slavery" conceived by the World Elite -"Communism".
Subversive Neo-Slavery via a Monetary Criminal enterprise:
Social Engineering through the monetary system as administered through a Cabal of political’s and bankers, thus enters the “THE GREAT DEPRESSION”, an example of what we are being faced with in today's unraveling of government corruption and collusion with the banking system as managed by the nefarious Federal Reserve and controlling bankers.
P 10
Meanwhile and on account of it, we ourselves are about to enter into the midst of the greatest depression we have ever known. From the Atlantic to the Pacific, our Country has been ravaged and laid waste by the evil practices of the Fed and the interests which control them. At no time in our history, has the general welfare of the people been at a lower level or the minds of the people so full of despair.
History is the best teacher but most often ignored:
"Recently in one of our States, 60,000 dwelling houses and farms were brought under the hammer in a single day. 71,000 houses and farms in Oakland County, Michigan, were sold and their erstwhile owners dispossessed. The people who have thus been driven out are the wastage of the Fed. They are the victims of the Fed. Their children are the new slaves of the auction blocks in the revival of the institution of human slavery. Constitutional Union:
In order to better understand the function of our present demise as in government control and to break through the Marxist lies of which we are fed, we have got to become cognizant of legal and historical information in order to set a solid foundation for understanding the problems we face and how we got into this quagmire of Neo-Slavery. First off, it must be understood that the position as originally relegated to the federal government is that it was not, is not to do business with the people of the several republics, those republics are, or as intended, the states as in the now 50 states of the United States of America. This is where states sovereignty comes in or the meaning there of. By reviewing Article 1, section 8 of the original (organic) Constitution. It is also imperative that you understand the Ninth and Tenth Articles in Amendments as in the organic Constitution. Understand the term "organic" is in reference to the original Constitution. These Amendments were to protest the peoples (the several states) of America from the Union government.
True Country and Nation of Americans:
Strange as it may seem, most American s are unaware that their true country and nation is that of the following: 1. Native state, which is a natural national(your) domicile, or 2. Chosen state, which is considered an acquired national domicile (home of residence). Should you consider confirmation as representative of this fact, you would do well to read what Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 has to say about it. You can Google up the dictionary as many other article's or definitions on line with out leaving the house.
P 11
Country: By country, is meant the state of which one is a member. Every man's country is in general, the state in which he happens to have been borne. Now, if you go to Black's Law Dictionary, looking under Country, you will find described as - The territory occupied by an independent nation of people, or the inhabitants of such territory. In the primary meaning "country" it denotes the population, the nation, the state, or the government, having possession and dominion over a territory. (Somewhat vague?)
It must be understood that the change of definition is not due to modernization. Further, it does get old hearing people say "Times have changed" or "the Constitution is old" or is "fluid" to meet the more modern times. It is evident they have been programmed by Communist dicta. This remindes me, of a time that I asked a deputy sheriff of his opinion, or thoughts on the Constitution. He was also previously a Marine prior to becoming a deputy. His remark was-"Oh that, the Constitution, was for those people way back then in the early years and doesn't fit our modern times. Our modern times? How about a hundred years from now in another modern time? A new constitution of today wouldn't be fitting then? This is a premium example of programming, brain washing, and the scary part of law enforcement as it is infiltrated with Marxist logic. You need to understand that your state is your true country and nation. You more than likely never gave that a bit of thought nor did you ever realize that at a matter of fact because you/we, have been lied to. This is the failure, failure by design of our public schools as they are tax supported thus government controlled. It must be further understood that de jure state nationals, not United States citizens, are the sovereign power of their countries.
Pursuant to the fact of disinformation, the Constitution does not give the several states a Democracy. How often in today's lingo do you hear the term Democracy? All too often and there is a reason for that dummying down. The Constitution guarantees a republic government. Such a government can be evidenced in Article IV, section 4, of the Constitution. Rome became a so-called Democracy, what you live in now. The Roman Empire collapsed due to its people over indulging in sporting events (distractions), dictatorships(executive orders), corruption, military aggression(nation building), etc. Does this sound familiar when looking at the events of the last century and this, the 21st century? Local Control:
Local Control is Key to happiness just as Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote in 1762: "The Social Contract or principles of Political Right," In this particular writing he stated the following about the political rights of people: "...the political rights of people would be best guarded if they were kept very local, not broad."
P 12
I would take that to mean, as in a political spectrum, local to mean within one's own community rather than out side of that community or within one's own state rather than not as a broad since of the word, the United States in total of all states as United States government, "the state."
The Republic political premise under the Constitution is based on the premise of local principles as noted by Jean Jacques Rousseau. These principles are fundamentally noted as:
1. The several states of America-which are American republics and /or nation, i.e. entitled 'the people, as a collective unit are but separated from each other as Oklahoma is separated from Louisiana who is separated from Texas and so forth.......
~ All people of a particular state were citizens (nationals) of the particular state in which they lived (American national, e. g. Ohio national, Iowa national, etc....) This means that "Legally", your state or country of birth is where your lawful (Constitutional) allegiance is! Se Title 8 USC~1101(a)(21). The term 'national' means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state. For further information on state nationalities, based on the Law of Nations, see 1984 U.S. Government Style Manual, chapter 5.22/5.23.
2. The United government is separate from peoples of the several republics.
Furthermore, to continue this political curriculum, Alexander Hamilton set forth this in Federalist Paper number 9 in reference to the proposed government of the federation; it was the premise of the United States, non-interference in the affairs of the several American republics otherwise known as the individual states as independent republics:
"As this government is composed of small republics, it
enjoys the internal happiness of each." (Alexander Hamilton)
Following the Republic, political reasoning found in the Federalist Papers, the Founding Fathers fully outlined what a Republic Form of Government was to consist of in the Papers.
Again, the Republican Form of Government is guaranteed to the states by the union, i.e. via the federal government, in Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. Such form of government is clearly noted by the following statement by James Madison in the Federalist Paper 10:
"The two great points of difference between a Democracy and a Republic are:
1. First, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a
small number of citizens elected by the rest;
2. Secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of
country, over which the latter may be extended."
P 13
In other words: The several republics make up the federal government; many local controlled governments extending outward from the counties of each republic; not inward as it is now. Currently, money is taken from each republic, then is distributed amongst the several States as the federal government sees fit. The federal government uses such power as leverage against the States to dictate "ITS" policies to them. These measures destroy the fundamental purpose of the Ninth and Tenth Articles in Amendment, which protected the states.
Moreover, a nation which does not contribute as much as another takes from one that is more productive, thus destroying the internal happiness of each republic as originally outlined by the founding fathers. The none-productive have to become more productive, and the productive have less incentive to remain productive to the benefit its society. ( So now, you have what can be termed as "Cooperative Federalism", thus entering the realm of Socialism within the United States Government.) This does not take any brains to figure out how states (independent nations) have been usurped and taken over by a socialist form of government, and a government with an out of control fiscal appetite. Just from this little bit of exposure of truth as intended, or fact, you can see as in our present debate of the national debt just how corrupt and uneducated the members of congress are, regardless of their degrees or political B.S. Because of the way the U.S. government has been allowed to usurp the Constitution and abridge the states of nations, (we are now entering a phase of "Economic Armageddon", a declared war on the American public. )
As noted by Major General Paul Vallely:
“ The U.S. government is the people residing within 50 states. If the Congressional Evangelist are not focused on the plan, it should be immediately identified and noted and constantly addressed by the state government and state watchdog groups and local media. (‘always keep score’)”…. So, you see, it is back to local control, the people of the free and independent states, nations within their own rights that should have and should control our out of control congress, the legislative branch of the federal government. The states have got to take charge and express their sovereignty thus emphasizing the power of local control.
Land Ownership and Suffrage:
Just what is "Land Ownership, and what is meant by Suffrage"? The objective of the people of America gaining and having control of the politics of the nation, state suffrage had originally come from the ownership of land. Each republic established its own dictates in regard.
P 15
These premises were established in the Federalist Paper, 35 by Alexander Hamilton. There is logic behind his premise: "Nothing remains but the landed interest; and this, in a political view, and particularly in relation to taxes, it can be taken to be perfectly united, from the wealthiest landlord down to the poorest tenant. No tax can be laid on land that will not affect the proprietor of millions of acres as well as the proprietor of a single acre. Every landholder will therefore have a common interest to keep the taxes on land as low as possible; and common interest may always be reckoned upon as the surest bond of sympathy."....
Hamilton further stated in Federalist Paper 35:
"It is said to be necessary, that all classes of citizens should have some of their own number in the representative body, in order that their feelings and imam be the better understood and attended to. . . Will not the landholder know and feel whatever will promote or insure the interest of landed property? And will he not, from his own prejudice or incumbents? There is no part of the administration of government that requires extensive information and a thorough knowledge of the principals of political economy, so much as the business of taxation. The man who understands those principles best will be least likely to resort to oppressive expedients, or sacrifice any particular class of citizens to the procurement of revenue."
Socialism Promotes Irresponsibility:
How does one identify a corrupt state??
"Obviously, the more corrupt the State, the more numerous the laws." This theory of fact filters down to and through the state legislature as well. State Legislatures and the U.S. congress are in the business of control and for the self, make work legislation in order to collect a pay check. Think about it.
We are now experiencing the making, application, and institutionalizing of Socialism within the United States today, and there is no slowing it down as it is racing at break neck speed liken to that of a run a way train.
The current bastardized government - instituted just after the so-called Civil War; is based on Socialism / Communism. I have harped on the Communistic encroachment for many years only to be preaching to deaf ears; especially since the downing of the Berlin Wall, which brought an end to the "Cold War" and Communism. Not hardly an end to Communism as it is, it is alive and well and, "as you can see, if you open your eyes and mind Morpheous, again, I can only show you the door, you have to walk through it.
P 16
Maybe you have heard the Marxist expression: "Pay Your Fair Share". A common sense consensus of paying your fair share is not that of taking from "haves" and "contributors" and giving it to "have-nots" and "non-contributors", hence, raising taxes for welfare to maintain shiftless people who care not to truly contribute to the peoples of a specific American republic. This tacit political formula is simply a ;lot to destroy---or bring down----people of the middle class, hence creating a nation of serfs. i.e. servitude. Accordingly, these measures transfer all land and wealth to the control of the World Elite for their benefit.
These matters are in parallel to what Thomas Jefferson once said:
"If we can prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people
under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy."
Americans are being usbversively and intentionally over taxed. It can be stated with conviction that not too man American are happy aboutwhat has transpired. This secretly imposed adult baby-sitting service has cost American their freedom, and accordingly their true sovereignty.
Without question such losses are primarily caused by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Insurgent Democracy:
There are several cases on the Fourteenth Amendment ranging from such a case as the Dred Scott to the Slaughterhouse cases. As both cases are quite extensive, and convincing tht all such case law was orchestrated drivel to substantiate the necessity for the existence, and the passage of; the Fourteenth Amendment, which is fallout from the Civil War.
The so called Civil War is commonly said to be over the issue of slavery. Slavery as an issue of the
cause of the war can be construed in fact as a White Flag being raised as you will or have to come to the realization that the Slaves were transfered over to the control of the United States, the "State". Further understanding that under this transfere from private ownership to federal ownership does not, did not limit itself to the black slave as we know slavery, but to all person's regardless of race,creed, or color who were then classified as citizen's of the Union-the United States government.
So, in short, reference is being made to all American being tacitly enslaved by the purported government of the Union: again, the "United States." It get even better and with better meaning as to how the transfere was made.
P 17
Hegelian Dialectic:
Now comes the excuse or the engineered need of reason for the Civil War. In reality, the slavery issue was just a mechanism used to implement the Civil War; this was accomplished by using a thing called the Hegelian Dialectic. By being cognizant of today's fact of happening, you will see this theor applied many times over. Does Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya sound familiar? There are many more such examples past and present but in this Century , these are the best examples. The Hegelian Dialectic is a technique named after the German philosopeher, Hegel. A perpetrator uses the heglian process to bring about a desired result by using mob psychology. the process is in three parts and is illustrated as follows:
1. Thesis: A problem is intentionally created: The immorality of slavery.
2. Antithesis: Opposition to the problem is created: The Civil War.
3. Synthesis: The desired result is the "solution": The Fourteenth Amendment, i.e. the "Reconstruction Amendments", the 13th, 14th, 15th. This can be regarded as the Conversion of the Republic!
The Great Depression of the 1930's was an incident orchestrated according to the Hegelian Dialectic. But note that the Hegelian Dialectic is not just confined to America. The anti-terrorist legislation of Adolph Hitler in the 1930's Germany is a perfect example. Hitler wanted the capability to detain people without question and hold them in custody without a court hearing. "Could there be a re-occurrence of such an event in our day of combating terrorism?" The people of Germany desired no such thing; so Hitler's minions burned the Reichstag building to the ground. He blamed terrorists for the incident. The media portrayed the event to be a danger to society and the well being of the German people. The demanded that something be done, so Hitler introduced his anti-terrorist legislation and did so with the enthusiastic consent of the people. Does such an incident sound familiar to you? Are you ready for your ID chip? You do remember the "Patriot Act" ?? Was there a particular incident that brought about the Patriot Act legislation??
De Facto and De Jure:
My goodness, what are De Facto and De Jure?? Now that it has been established how a planned societal change is brought about, we can better address the issue of the unlawful government that are not present in the republics. First, you must understand the precise difference between de facto and de jure. Simply put: defactois not according to law; and, dejureis according to law.
P 18
Hence, the legal definitions:
De Facto: In fact (of fact); as distinguished from "de jure", by right.
De Jure: By right; by lawful right; rightfully; complying with the law in all respects; valid in law. (i.e. constitutional; in conformity with the law of nations.)
To apply the above definitions of defacto and de jure, you must first be aware that after the Civil War (co-called) the federal government gained dominion (it conquered and controlled) over all states in guise of the Union. A governmental system de facto was then created by the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. The amendment stealthily and politicallyfabricates all several States i the Union to be quasi-political subdivisions of the "United States". It should be noted that the quasi-political subdivisions of the "United States" would or is best described as " The ultimate ownership of all peroperty is in the State; individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law, amounting to meere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State-"the Union; the United States Government, the State". The fact that citizens, at a given time may prefer speci to currency, or vice versa. So, in reality, you do not own your property, you own it but only by virtue, perhaps as a "share cropper?" "A lessee?", what you think you own can be sold for taxes, or condemned for-what ever reason for another use, but not by you. Think in terms of the U.N. Agenda 21, or think in terms of your automobile; you do not own it, the state owns it and instead of you having a clear title, you are issued a "certificate of title" while the state keeps the real title. Sad but so true.
Simply put, all previous, is all dicta, which is established by the Communist Manifesto. "Review the Communist Manifesto."
De Facto government(s) will be discussed as this discovery of U.S. Government usurpation progresses.
1. The federal and state governments are not your "constitutional" governments.
2. As a matter of law, they are not governments "IN FACT".
3. They are, as a matter of law, INSURGENT. In other words: An Insurgent Democracy.
Actually, they are military style governments, which will be described in more detail later.
Insurgent Governments:
As defined by the United States Supreme Court, the legal description that is attached to the insurgents' governmental system under the Fourteenth Amendment is as follows:
P 19
Government De Facto: A government of fact--Government "of fact" not "in fact" Definition source: Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe...
1. A government actually exercising power and control, as opposed to the true and lawful government; a government not established according to the Constitution of the nation, or not lawfully entitled to recognition or supremacy, but which has nevertheless supplanted or displaced the government de jure.
2. A government deemed unlawful, or deemed wrongful or unjust, which, nevertheless, receives presently habitual obedience from the bulk of the community.
3. There are several degrees of what is called "de facto government". Such a government, in its highest degree, assumes a character very closely resembling that of a lawful government.
(a) This is when the usurping government expels the regular authorities from their customary seats and function, and establishes itself in their place, and so becomes the actual government of a country.
( Not unlike an evil spirit that takes over the soul causing a person to become who they are not. (Injected lustration)
(b) The distinguishing characteristic of such a government is that adherents to it in war against the government de jure do not incur the penalties of treason; and, under certain limitation, obligations assumed by it in behalf of the country or otherwise will, in general, be respected by the government, dejure when restored.
4. Such a government might be more aptly denominated a "government of paramount force,” being maintained by active military power against the rightful authority of an establi9shed and lawful government; and obeyed in civil matters by private citizens.
5. They are usually administered directly by military authority, but civil authority, supported more or less by military force, may administer them, also.
The above is not just a general definition. In its dictum, the court silently described the current insurgent governmental system. It is recommended that you study the content of its dissertation and compare it with what will be put forth in explanatory fact in this treatise. Legal evidence will be set forth later on that supports that the Fourteenth Amendment actually creates "Quiet Wars" within the several republics (states, your state) of America; this having people act in treason to their countries, (their state of domicile).
TO BE CONTINUED TO PART TWO: "MARXISM ESTABLISHED IN AMERICA"
The Evergreen Supertanker is not just limited to fighting fire . It will be a true utilitarian aircraft with the capability to configure to different applications on short notice. This multimission aircraft can support sensitive security and environmental missions. The aircraft’s exceptional drop capabilities, loiter time and size make it an ideal tool to perform challenging homeland security missions, able to neutralize chemical attacks on military installments or major population centers, and help control large, environmentally disastrous oil spills.
In addition, the upper deck of the Boeing 747 provides over 200 square feet of space that could be assigned as a command and control center. EIA possesses an FAA exemption number 1870C that permits the carriage of up to five individuals that are not crewmembers in the upper deck. This area is capable of providing space for command and control components that would assist in sophisticated mapping, incident monitoring and video/communications downlink relay that might require additional personnel over and above the required crew.
What airports will Evergreen operate the Supertanker out of?
Evergreen will operate the aircraft from any major airport with sufficient ramp space to load the aircraft. These include civilian bases, joint use civilian/military bases and accessible military bases. Generally, the runway requirements for the Evergreen Supertanker are 8000 feet.
Can the Supertanker fight fires at night, while they are most vulnerable? The Supertanker utilizes advanced avionics and flies at higher, safer altitudes, which will enable fire agencies the option of fighting fires at night, while they are dormant.
Are there any other markets for the Evergreen Supertanker? Can it operate globally? Evergreen is studying other applications for the Supertanker. Oil spill containment, chemical decontamination and weather modification are all potential markets for this aircraft. Because the aircraft is pressurized, the Evergreen Supertanker has the capability of any long-range Boeing 747 passenger aircraft. This allows the aircraft to deploy to any international location.
If you want to read up for yourself on this, just go to gibiru.com, do a search on “Weather Control”, and then start clicking through the links that come up. You might find it as surprising as I did. Here is the bottom line:
Is weather control real?
Yes.
Do we have the technology to create a hurricane, or tornado, or earthquakes?
Yes.
Who has this technology?
The US and Russia. But Russia has been offering the technology for sale.
What specific technologies/techniques can be used to alter the weather and create storms?
Several.
High-energy lasers can be directed into the atmosphere which creates free oxygen (O2), this combined with hydrogen to create H2O – water. Space based lasers are even more effective, and can also create O3 (Ozone) in the process of creating water in the atmosphere. Water is the most essential element in weather. The amount of it at a given point in time at a given location can create wind shifts, rain, (obviously), snow, but a clever use of it can create a tornado, or, over water, a hurricane. Over warm ocean water, it creates a very powerful hurricane, and if created in the right position at the right time, prevailing winds will carry it where you want it to go.
But far more effective than that technology is the HAARP project in Alaska. This uses VLF (Very low frequency) energy pulses bounced off the ionosphere to create extreme weather conditions anywhere in the world they wish to direct it. The Earth has a fundamental resonant frequency of 7.83 hz. Anything that operates at that frequency risks disturbing all aspects of the earth. Weather, earthquakes, etc. It depends upon the amount of power produced. HAARP produces 1.7 gigawatts.
Here are a couple of interesting quotes about it I found on one of the websites I visited:
~~~
"The $30 million [Pentagon] project, euphemistically named HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), is made to beam more than 1.7 gigawatts (billion watts) of radiated power into the ionosphere -- the electrically charged layer above Earth's atmosphere. Put simply, the apparatus is a reversal of a radio telescope -- just transmitting instead of receiving. It will 'boil the upper atmosphere'. After [heating] and disturbing the ionosphere, the radiations will bounce back onto the earth in for form of long waves which penetrate our bodies, the ground and the oceans." ["Angels Don't Play This HAARP", page 8]
Let us allow Dr. Begich explain this concept. "... this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art ...." [Page 28]
"... the goal is to learn how to manipulate the ionosphere on a more grand scale than the the Soviet Union could do with its similar facilities. HAARP would be the largest ionospheric heater in the world, located in a latitude most conducive to putting Eastlund's invention into practice." [Page 29] Furthermore, from this northern latitude, the energy could be aimed into the ionosphere so that it would bounce back down to the earth so it would come down wherever the scientists wanted it to come down. The secret was to learn how and where to aim it to hit the earth where they wanted it to hit, creating the type of disaster or weather they desired.
In NEWS1198, "U.N. Treaty Proves Weather Control Is Real", we report news articles that Malaysia actually contracted with a Russian Weather Modification company to create a hurricane that would be directed close enough to clear the smoke and smog from Malaysia's cities without actually coming on to land to create devastation. This Russian company delivered, and Malaysia had clear skies.
Our information also tells us that, not only can hurricanes be created, they can be dismantled should scientists so desire. And, they certainly can be driven on the ocean much like we drive our cars on roadways. Therefore, one has to ask why American scientists have allowed unprecedented hurricanes, like Andrew, to ever come on shore. Why are American scientists allowing extensive damage and lives lost to recent unprecedented storms, since they have the capability to keep these storms away from us?
HAARP can create nuclear-sized explosions without radiation! [Page 38, 62]. This process is protected by patent 4,873,928.
The greatest concern of New Age scientist Nick Begich, in his book, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", is that scientists and the military are so very arrogant in their ignorant, reckless use of focused energy into the ionosphere. Military scientists talk about "kicking this thing in high gear to see what would happen"! This attitude is complete arrogance. What if they set off an unintended reaction in the atmosphere that cannot be controlled or stopped?”
~~~
Well, if a country can deliver nuclear-like explosions anywhere in the world they wish, without using ICBM missiles and other nuclear delivery systems, then I suppose that makes traditional nuclear weapons arsenals obsolete for warfare purposes, and mostly only good for political posturing and negotiations. That would explain why both Russia and the US were willing to agree to disarmaments, and reductions in their nuclear proliferation. I think maybe that was the first time in human history that countries voluntarily chose to disarm themselves and reduce their ability to conduct war. Given the nature of mankind and his history, it would make much more sense if they had a better card up their sleeves.
Judging by the apparent irresponsible arrogance of the people in charge of it as suggested by Begich, I wonder who should be in charge of decision-making for this technology. Once a technology is invented, it cannot be ‘un-invented’. It is now there, and some people will try to use it. Most will try to use it to their personal advantage and to support their agendas. Always, it seems that those that want to act in the interest of all mankind lack the same level of energy and determination of those acting in self interest, and so the people that push their way to the top into positions of power and authority rarely act responsibly or altruistically, but rather they act to gain power and wealth to themselves.
Having said that, if we follow the line of reasoning logically, if we accept that current technology allows us to create a hurricane, then we have to ask ourselves who might have started a hurricane like Katrina that specifically destroyed the area where most of our oil refineries are? In whose interest does this serve? Who benefits from this?
Another interesting question: Since we apparently not only have the ability to create a hurricane, and steer it, and even stop it – why did we choose not to stop Katrina from doing the damage it did? Is the information incorrect? Can we start them, but not stop them? Or is there some other reason that Katrina served the purposes of some people? I honestly don’t know. I’m wondering myself.
Here is a chronology of the technological advances that contributed to weather control. The comments are not mine but come from that website that I found. I have to admit – as much as I would like to go back to thinking that the weather is not controllable, It’s hard to ignore this much information on the subject.
1900: "Tesla applies for patent on a device to 'Transmit Electrical Energy Through the Natural Mediums." In 1905, the U.S. Patent Office issue Patent #787,412 for this purpose. I bet it is news to everyone that the technology to transmit electrical power without wires exists, and exists so that the generation and transmission of electricity can be both bountiful and FREE! Of course, a lot of dollars of sales and profit would immediately vanish, so Tesla's discovery was never made public.
1924: "Confirmation that radio waves bounce off 'ionosphere 1' (an electrically charged layer starting at an altitude of 50 kilometers)."
1938: "Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter." The fact that untold numbers of powerful electron heaters are pouring tens of millions of watts of electricity at Extremely Low Frequencies to effect this Weather Warfare is the major reason we are experiencing Global Warming! This warming has nothing to do with any Industrial pollutants or emssions, and certainly not from cow flatulance, as New Age extremists have claimed. New World Order planners are able to make dire predictions and then technologically deliver them!
1940: "Tesla announces 'death ray' invention." Our military evidently has the capability to create a defense shield over our continent by aiming these electron heaters correctly.
1945: "Atomic bomb tests begin -- 40,000 electromagnetic pulses to follow."
1952: "W.O. Schumman identifies 7.83 Hertz the resonant frequency of the Earth".
1958: "Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged particles trapped in earth's magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. Violently disrupted in the same year."
1958: "Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes three nuclear bombs inside Van Allen belt."
1958: "White House advisor on weather modification says Defense Department studying ways to manipulate charges of 'earth and sky, and so affect the weather'." Wow! Did you know that such a department as "Weather Modification" existed in the White House way back in 1952? The mere existence of such an office strongly implies the technology to modify and control the weather existed.
1960: "Series of weather disasters begin."
1961: "Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960's the dumping of chemicals (barium powder, etc.) from satellites and rockets began."
1961-62: "U.S.S.R. and U.S.A. create many electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) in the atmosphere. 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer by about 4%." Hmm, ozone layer depletion was intentionally created by both Russian and American governments by nuclear detonations? They not only knew about it, they measured the extent of the depletion and the time it lasted. Therefore, do you think it just might be possible that, once again, we have the situation where a dire prediction is made, with the knowledge that their scientists can actually make it happen?!
1962: "Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma."
1966: "Gordon J.F. MacDonald publishes military ideas on environmental engineering."
1960's: In Wisconsin, U.S. Navy Project Sanguine lays extremely low frequency (ELF) antennae." We are told that the Navy needed this ELF capability to communicate with their submarines in a way that would be secure from enemy attack, a claim with which we do not argue. However, is it also possible that this ELF antennae may serve a dual purpose, of also helping to control the weather?
1968: "Moscow scientists tell the West that they have pinpointed which pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological functions and which frequencies do harm." The very idea that a wicked totalitarian government serving Antichrist could know how to manipulate thought processes by the use of electromagmetic pusles is one of the most frightening thoughts imaginable! This little incident also shows the unusual cooperation between Russia and America at the height of the Cold War! Such cooperation constitutes proof of our claim that Russia has cooperated with the Western Powers since the beginning, in 1917, to stage the mock battle of Thesis battling Antithesis to produce the Synthesis system of Antichrist called the New World Order.
1972: "First reports on 'ionospheric heater' experiments with high frequency radio waves at Arecibo [Alaska]. A 100 megawatt heater in Norway built later in the decade can change the conductivity of the auroral ionosphere." Now, you are getting close to being able to control the weather. When you can manipulate the conductivity of the auroal ionosphere, where weather systems operate and originate, you are close to controlling the weather. Note the date here, at which time this technology was realized: 1972.
1973: "Documentation that the launch of Skylab 'halved the total electron content of the ionosphere for three hours' (by rocket exhaust gases)."
1974: "United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare." We reported on this terrible treaty in NEWS1196, "U.N. Treaty Proves Weather Control Is Real". You do not need a treaty banning Weather Warfare unless such technology already exists and has been proven effective. This means that this Weather Warfare technology has been fine tuned for 24 years.
1974: "High frequency experiments at Plattsville, Colorado Arecibo, Puerto Rico, and in Armidale, New South Wales. These experiments heated the 'bottom side of the ionosphere."
1974: "Experiments -- airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons."
1975: "Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that very low frequency (VLF) from power lines is altering the ionosphere." I remember this report well, as I scoffed at the idea that power lines could have that kind of effect on this huge earth. I never thought of the fact that the reason they could have this kind of effect is that they are just the right kind of frequency to affect the earth.
1975: "U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces the Navy to release research showing that extremely low frequency (ELF) transmissions can altar human blood chemistry." Once again, this technology begins to hit very close to home, does it not? When an enemy can altar my blood chemistry by aiming ELF transmissions at me, I can be destroyed with no knowledge of what is happening to me, or who is doing such lethal damage. Can you also sense the possibilty of control of an entire population, without the people ever being aware they are being manipulated?!
1975: "U.S. Senator Pell, Senate Subcommitted, urges that weather and climate modification work should be overseen by a civilian agency answerable to the U.S. Congress. Didn't happen." In NEWS1196, we report that Senator Pell urged the United States to sign this United Nations treaty banning Weather Warfare. It sounds like Pell was very concerned about the use and misuse of this technology, even though he is fully aware of the New World Order Plan and has acted to support it for many years.
1975: "Soviets begin pulsing 'Woodpecker' extremely low frequency (ELF) waves at key brainwave rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, was one of the locations where Woodpecker was aimed, and where people were particularly affected." Once, again, I am extremely agitated to discover that an enemy can destroy me either biologically or mentally from a distance, without me being aware of it.
1976: "Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show that nerve cells are affected by ELF fields."
1979: "Launch of NASA's third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory causes large scale, artificially induced depletion in the ionosphere. The plasma hole was caused by 'rapid chemical processes' between rocket exhaust and the ozone layer. The ionosphere was significantly depleted over a horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours."
1985: "Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent 'Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere'. (First of three Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power Technologies, Inc.)"
1986: "U.S. Navy Project Henhouse duplicates the Delgado (Madrid) experiment -- very low level, very low frequency pulsed magnetic fields harm chick embryos."
1980's: "In the latter part of the decade, the U.S. begins the network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves ..." IN NEWS1196, we reported that the GWEN towers created a high level electromagnetic dam in the atmosphere in the American Midwest that created the rain for 40 days and nights in 1993. GWEN towers were located right where the rain came down in such a Biblical type deluge. Furthermore, we showed a map of the United States where you could see the GWEN towers and where they were located. We found it extremely interesting that these towers were also located along the San Andreas fault in Califormai and Nevada, where all these earthquakes of the past decade have been occurring!
1987-1992: "Other ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI) scientists build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities."
1994: "Military contractor E-systems buys APTI, holder of Eastlund patents and contract to build the biggest ionospheric heater in the world, the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP). Even though construction of HAARP towers in Alaska began before this date, this was the time the decision was made to make it as large as it is now today, over 40 acres of ELF towers.
1994: "Congress freezes the funding on HAARP until planners increase the emphasis on earth penetrating tomography uses, for nuclear counterproliferation efforts." Once again, we have to wonder if this technology might be used to create earthquakes, as well as monitor compliance with nuclear test ban treaties.
1995: "Congress budgets $10 million for 1996, under "nuclear counterproliferation' efforts for HAARP project." At least now we know that the U.S. Government is in firm control of HAARP, the same government driving us full speed into the global government of Antichrist, known as the New World Order.
1994-6: "Testing of first stage of HAARP equipment continues ..."
1996: HAARP planners to test the earth penetrating tomography applications by modulating the electroject at ELF frequencies." Let's see, were there any severe or unusual earthquakes, or series of earthquakes, in 1996? We shall study this and get back to you.
1998: "Projected date for fully operating HAARP system." We have had the most unusual severe weather in 1997 and 1998. It is no coincidence that the onset of this unprecedented weather coincided with the completion of the HAARP system. Now, scientists can create and control all types of weather, especially disasters.
Evergreen Aviation has a long history of government contracts, ranging from the USPS to unmanned flight operations for the USAF.
Japan has passed a law that will enable the police and contractors to monitor internet activity without restriction to "cleanse" the Internet of any "bad" Fukushima radiation news.
As I previous reported, Japan has officially ordered the censorship of any reporting of the truth about the Fukushima nuclear radiation fallout by ordering telecommunications companies and web masters to scrub any stories negative stories from the about the disaster.
The government of Japan has issued an official order to telecommunications companies and web masters to censor reports which contradict the state media reports that the Fukushima nuclear radiation disaster is over.
Japan Government Officially Censors Truth About Fukushima Nuclear Radiation Disaster
The supposedly free democratic nation of Japan, which supposedly values and promotes freedom of speech, has officially issued orders to telecommunication companies and webmasters to remove content from websites that counter the official government position that the disaster is over and there is no more threat from the radiation.
The government charges that the damage caused by earthquakes and by the nuclear accident are being magnified by irresponsible rumors, and the government must take action for the sake of the public good. The project team has begun to send “letters of request” to such organizations as telephone companies, internet providers, cable television stations, and others, demanding that they “take adequate measures based on the guidelines in response to illegal information. ”The measures include erasing any information from internet sites that the authorities deem harmful to public order and morality.
Note: I saw the executive order issued by Japan a week or two ago but could not find it in an English version anywhere but didn't report on it because the Japanese to English translated versions of the order did not provide clear enough meaning. What I gathered from the order was that Japan ordered telecommunication companies to provide notices to websites and webmasters to remove messages from internet bulletin boards and websites that conflicted with the Government reported version of events. If the websites and webmasters did not comply the telecommunication companies are to shut down offending websites as this is considered a national security issue which is affecting public safety and contributing to public unrest. It was also ordered that email communications be monitored to prevent the spread of false rumors. If you can find the original executive order, please send me a tip with the link.
[...]
When Tanaka requested the names of the media executives hosted by TEPCO in China, Katsumata retorted, “I cannot reveal their names since this is private information.” But it is precisely such collusive relations between mainstream media, the government and TEPCO, that results in the censorship of information concerning nuclear problems.
Now the Japanese government has moved to crack down on independent reportage and criticism of the government’s policies in the wake of the disaster by deciding what citizens may or may not talk about in public. A new project team has been created by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, the National Police Agency, and METI to combat “rumors” deemed harmful to Japanese security in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.
The government charges that the damage caused by earthquakes and by the nuclear accident are being magnified by irresponsible rumors, and the government must take action for the sake of the public good. The project team has begun to send “letters of request” to such organizations as telephone companies, internet providers, cable television stations, and others, demanding that they “take adequate measures based on the guidelines in response to illegal information. ”The measures include erasing any information from internet sites that the authorities deem harmful to public order and morality.
Apparently the previous order was not enough to stem the flow of negative news as Japan has passed allow that will allow police unrestricted access to monitor all Internet communications to crack down on the so-called rumors. Making matters worse, Japan has issued open bids for companies to monitor blogs and social media such as tweets to crack down on the information making its way around the internet.
According to are report on the U.K progressive, the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, opened a call for bids (tender) regarding the “Nuclear Power Safety Regulation Publicity Project”, for contractors to monitor blogs and tweets posted about nuclear power and radiation.
“Nuclear Power Safety Regulation Publicity Project” stipulates that, “The Contractor is required to monitor blogs on nuclear power and radiation issues as well as Twitter accounts (monitoring tweets is essential) around the clock, and conduct research and analysis on incorrect and inappropriate information that would lead to false rumors, and to report such internet accounts to the Agency. The “Contractor” is required to keep the Agency well informed on the internet accounts and keywords used in the blogs and Twitter accounts that are posting incorrect and inappropriate information. The Contractor is required to maintain sufficient number of personnel for around-the-clock monitoring. The Contractor is required to submit reports on internet accounts via CDR.” The document, however, does not state that blogs or Twitter accounts, which run afoul of METI’s guidelines, are to be banned or frozen.”
Since March 11, 2011 it has been reported that YouTube videos containing footage or comments unfavorable to Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) or the Japanese government have been removed within several hours of their posting. Examples of offending YouTube videos include excerpts of TV shows with controversial comments like footage showing smoke emitted from the nuclear reactors, and an ex-TEPCO employee speaking on his Fukushima experiences. Likewise, Twitter accounts with too much content regarding nuclear power and radiation issues have been disrupted.
Prof. Ibusuki of Seijo Univ. Law Dept. comments:
“The Computer Network Monitoring Law will enable the police to monitor anyone’s internet activity without restriction.” Although this appears, on the surface, to be beneficial when targeting cyber-attacks, some Japanese commentators are suggesting that the law is un-Constitutional……
“Nuclear Power Safety Regulation Publicity Project” stipulates that, “The Contractor is required to monitor blogs on nuclear power and radiation issues as well as Twitter accounts (monitoring tweets is essential) around the clock, and conduct research and analysis on incorrect and inappropriate information that would lead to false rumors, and to report such internet accounts to the Agency. The “Contractor” is required to keep the Agency well informed on the internet accounts and keywords used in the blogs and Twitter accounts that are posting incorrect and inappropriate information. The Contractor is required to maintain sufficient number of personnel for around-the-clock monitoring. The Contractor is required to submit reports on internet accounts via CDR.” The document, however, does not state that blogs or Twitter accounts, which run afoul of METI’s guidelines, are to be banned or frozen.”
Saturday, July 23, The Japan Times reported, about 1,500 cows that were fed hay containing radioactive cesium, in excess of the government limit, were found to have been shipped from Fukushima and other prefectures to all of Japan except Okinawa, as of Thursday, July 21. Evidence of rising contamination in and around the plant has tempered optimism, and new reports has consumers raising questions about whether it remains safe to eat beef, chicken and pork.
Since March 11, 2011 it has been reported that YouTube videos containing footage or comments unfavorable to Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) or the Japanese government have been removed within several hours of their posting. Examples of offending YouTube videos include excerpts of TV shows with controversial comments like footage showing smoke emitted from the nuclear reactors, and an ex-TEPCO employee speaking on his Fukushima experiences. Likewise, Twitter accounts with too much content regarding nuclear power and radiation issues have been disrupted.
While many radioactive cattle have been discovered long distances from Fukushima, what is more important is where their feed is coming from.
Uncanny Terrain: Yoshizawa’s ranch is 14km downwind from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. The government ordered him to kill his 300 cows. Most of his neighbors’ animals are gone, but some have been released and joined his herd. Yoshizawa refuses to kill his cows. He wants them to be studied for the effects of radiation.
Straw found 45 miles from Fukushima is highly contaminated with radioactive cesium, which is an indication that radiation has contaminated large portions of Northern Japan. More than half a million disintegration per second in a kilogram of straw are comparable to Chernobyl levels.
The American Nuclear Regulatory Commission was correct when it told Americans to evacuate beyond 50 miles from Fukushima – the Japanese should have done the same. Ex-Secretariat, Gundersen, of Japan’s Nuclear Safety Commission blames this contamination on “Black Rain”. “Rather than minimize the information the Japanese people receive,” Gundersen suggests, “minimizing their radiation exposure..”
This video included in the progressive report page shows the type of the negative information Japan is trying to keep a lid. Even in light of the recent beef scandal were Japan allowed highly radioactive beef to be shipped all over the country and be eaten when it was widely reported that the beef was highly radioactive this man whose cows are only 14 miles from the Fukushima plant refuses to kill his cows.
Meanwhile, in this video, Nuclear Engineer Arnie Gundersen says it is time to stop trying to minimize the flow of information and start minimizing the radiation exposure people are receiving.
