Showing posts with label Biden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biden. Show all posts

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Is Obama Admin Fabricating Iranian Assassination Plot To Distract From Fast & Furious Investigation? Or to Add General Chaos?

Video:  Is Obama Admin Fabricating Iranian Assassination Plot To Distract From Fast & Furious Investigation?

Initial Reactions in Iran to Report on Foiling of Iranian Terror Operation in Washington

Yesterday the DOJ’s Eric Holder took credit for foiling an Iranian Terror Operation in Washington.  We commented then: “Sure is convenient for Holder though… takes the focus off the fact that he was supposed to have been served with a subpoena today for Fast and Furious - Gunwalker…  How convenient indeed?!?  Makes you wonder if this news was to cover for his other deeds; sad that you have to think that way!!”

He was finally served today~

clip_image001

Feds Foil Massive Iran-Linked Terror Plot on U.S.

And now it turns out that no one is buying this story.  Why would Iran leave any trace of their involvement? 
The timing (DOJ covers for deeds), the fact that Iran has left a trace of their involvement – sloppy…

Glenn Beck spent quite a lot of time on his show today talking about just this subject. Something about this story is just wrong!

Now it comes out that they have known about Operation Red Coalition for months; killing an Israeli and a Saudi on U.S soil.  So why report it now?  If you think about it in a traditional way (pre-9.11) Pros: This act would tie Israel, Saudi Arabia and the U.S. together and if you can pull this off it would make us (all 3) look weak.  And if the U.S. does not respond we look weak to the world.  Con: The negative is that we could end up wiping Iran off the map… if we had any guts.

Post 9.11 thinking: How about just announcing this… even if this isn’t true because if opens the door for the globalists to move forward with their NWO plans and it would work for our administration as well as those organizing the Occupy Wall Street and Arab Spring uprisings… all the same people anyway!  Wake-up America! Think about it, if you announce events without closure it adds to the chaos!

If you are a GBTV subscriber please watch today’s show on Demand.  If you are not, consider signing up and watching this and tomorrow’s show.  The first two weeks are free and you can cancel after that if you like what you see and hear.  Glenn is doing a special tomorrow on a solution, a personal survival.

More things to think about:

The progressive players are ramping up the propaganda machine - Joe Biden, Dick Durbin, and King from NY. 

Joe Biden
http://twitter.com/#!/mpoppel

mpoppel Michael van Poppel

REU: BIDEN SAYS U.S. RESPONSE COULD INVOLVE SANCTIONS BUT "NOTHING HAS BEEN TAKEN OFF THE TABLE"

mpoppel Michael van Poppel

REU: BIDEN SAYS U.S. WORKING TO UNITE WORLD OPINION BEHIND POSSIBLE ACTIONS OVER "OUTRAGEOUS" IRANIAN BEHAVIOR

mpoppel Michael van Poppel

REU: US VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN SAYS IRAN WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ALLEGED PLOT TO KILL SAUDI AMBASSADOR – ABC

US hopeful Hunstman wants preemptive Iran strike
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/203872.html
US Republican presidential contender Jon Huntsman says “American force” should be used to preemptively attack Iran and stop Tehran from developing its nuclear program.
“I cannot live with a nuclear-armed Iran. If you want an example of when I would use American force, it would be that,” AFP quoted Huntsman as saying on Monday, while outlining his foreign policy in an address at a university in New Hampshire.

Quick Mitt Map, seems very well connected
Romney’s Neocon Foreign Policy Plan

Cain:  Iran and Other Countries Challenge America Because They See Obama as a ‘Weak President’

http://nation.foxnews.com/herman-cain/2011/10/12/cain-iran-and-other-countries-challenge-america-because-they-see-obama-weak-president

And we need to know what the other GOP candidates think as well and hear directly from them on what they think about this incident.

Hillary Clinton

"The idea that they would attempt to go to a Mexican drug cartel to solicit murder-for-hire to kill the Saudi ambassador? Nobody could make that up, right?" Clinton said shortly after U.S. prosecutors accused two suspected Iranian agents of trying to murder Saudi envoy Adel Al-Jubeir. 

...sounds kind of suspicious, no?

Initial Reactions in Iran to Report on Foiling of Iranian Terror Operation in Washington

Hours after the October 11, 2011 release of a report in Washington on the foiling of intentions by two Iranian nationals to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the U.S. and to carry out an attack on the Saudi Embassy in Washington, Iranian regime representatives and the Iranian media denied the allegations.

In Iran, the affair is being referred to as an "evil plot" of the U.S. administration which has been damaged by the fall of the Middle East regimes identified with it. This plot, it is being claimed, was aimed at diverting the attention of the American public from the Occupy Wall Street protests, and also at distracting public attention in the Middle East from the Islamic awakening, at sowing severe discord between Tehran and its neighbors, and at extricating Israel from its isolation.

Regime officials' reactions reflected fear of a harsh response by Saudi Arabia, as Saudi-Iran relations are already tense following the Bahrain crisis, and also fear of a U.S. military response.

The following are several initial Iranian reactions to the report of the affair:

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman: It's a U.S.-Zionist Plot; Iran-Saudi Relations Are Based On Mutual Respect

In a hastily called October 11 press conference, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast vehemently denied Washington's allegations against Iran. He said that with this "prefabricated scenario" and "humorous act,"[1] the U.S. and Israel, who were behind it, aimed to "sow discord" among the Islamic countries and thus help extricate Israel from its isolation.

Mehmanparast added that the allegations against Iran reflect an attempt by the White House to extricate itself from the widespread protests within and outside the country against its policy. He said that Riyadh-Tehran relations were based on mutual respect, and that such a false claim would do them no harm and would have no effect on world public opinion.[2]

Iranian Ambassador In Letter To U.N. Secretary-General: This "Evil Plot" Will Have "Detrimental Effects On Peace and Security"

In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, to the president of the U.N. Security Council, and to the president of the U.N. General Assembly, Iranian Ambassador to the U.N. Mohammad Khazaee said that Iran "strongly and categorically" rejects the "fabricated and baseless allegations, based on the suspicious claims by an individual," "condemns this shameful allegation," and "deplores it as a well-thought evil plot in line with [the U.S.'s] anti-Iranian policy to divert attention from the current economic and social problems at home and the popular revolutions and protests against United States long supported dictatorial regimes abroad."

Noting that "The U.S. allegation is, obviously, a politically-motivated move and a showcase of its long-standing animosity towards the Iranian nation," he warned, "Any country could accuse other countries through fabrication of such stories. However, this would set dangerous precedents in the relations among States."

He added, "The Islamic Republic of Iran warns against the implications of this horrible scenario and submits that the continuation of such divide-and-rule policies could have detrimental effects on peace and security... [Iran aims] to maintain its friendly relations with all regional countries, particularly with its Muslim neighbors, and invites all to be vigilant against the vicious campaigns targeting stability and peace and friendly relations among States in our region."

He continued, "As the Secretary-General of the United Nations, you have an important responsibility in enlightening the international public opinion about the dangerous consequences of warmongering policies of the United States Government on international peace and security."[3]

Iranian Majlis Speaker: The Americans Have Started a Children's Game To Divert Public Attention From Its Domestic and Middle East Problems

In an October 12 speech at the Majlis, answering criticism by the Majlis Supreme National Security Committee on the committee's lack of response to the allegations, Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani said that the Americans had made a "hasty and stupid" step aimed at diverting attention from its problems in the Middle East. He said that Washington's allegations regarding the foiling of an attack on the Saudi Embassy in Washington were aimed at marginalizing media coverage of its domestic problems.

He said: "U.S. Secretary of State [Hillary Clinton] was meant to issue a declaration in the final minutes of the night [of October 11, 2011] but the plan was cancelled. It transpires that they [the Americans] were politically paralyzed, and realized that they had started a children's game." He said that Tehran had normal relations with Saudi Arabia, and that there was no reason for Iran to plot such "childish operations."

Referring to Saudi Arabia, Larijani said, "We think that our neighbors have discerned that this is an American plot aimed at diverting public attention from its own problems in the region, but this plot has not managed to stop the Islamic awakening in the region." Turning to a member of the Supreme National Security Committee, he added, "I don't think that this issue is important enough for me to deal with."[4]

Majlis Supreme National Security Committee: This "Big Lie" Will Not Extricate the White House From the Wall Street Uprising

In an interview with the Iranian news agency Fars, Majlis Supreme National Security Committee chairman Ala Al-Din Boroujerdi said, "Without a doubt, this new American-Zionist plot was aimed at diverting public attention from the crisis in which [President] Obama has become entangled – [that is,] the Wall Street popular uprising." He assessed that the White House would not be successful in this attempt, and added, "Iran has never employed such a policy of assassinating individuals – on the contrary, it itself has been the victim of terrorism. Therefore, the claims by American officials are nothing more than a big lie." [5]

Entekhab: The Lack of a Determined, Effective Response Could Lead to a Military Attack Against Iran

In a reaction published immediately after the news of the affair broke, the Iranian website Entekhab, which is identified with critics of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, called the American allegations against Iran "a dangerous and rare scenario." It warned that "if Iranian Foreign Ministry officials do not respond firmly, effectively, and wisely, and if they do not succeed in responding to these ridiculous and silly claims by America and the West, the general atmosphere in the world could pave the way to a limited military attack on Iran."

The website also complained about the Iranian Foreign Ministry's passivity in the affair, and warned that if it continued the country could face "almost dreadful risks."[6]


[1] Fars (Iran), October 11, 2011.

[2] Mehr, Fars (Iran), October 11, 2011.

[3] Mehr, ISNA (Iran), October 12, 2011. 

[4] Mehr (Iran), October 12, 2011.

[5] Fars (Iran), October 11, 2011.

[6] Entekhab (Iran), October 11, 2011.

MEMRI - www.memri.org

Video: The Judge Accuses FBI & Our Govt Of Being The Real Terrorist! & Creating Terror Plots in America!

Related:

CNN: Growing Skepticism About Iranian Assassination Plot - October 13, 2011 CNN

Russia Today: 

Video:  Iranian Plot was an Inside Job +.Fast and Furious Distraction Propaganda

This is a montage of clips with Soros at about 4 minutes 

Video:  Occupy Wall Street: Road to Tyranny - The Last Chapter

BBC: US 'Iran attack plans' revealed

Posted by Ask Marion - h/t to Jean Stoner

Monday, February 15, 2010

The New World Empire

This is cleverly done!

The NEW WORLD ORDER EMPIRE ...!!!

The decline and fall of the American Empire:

clip_image001

Party guest from left to right: Tim Geithner, John Kerry, KSM, Oprah, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Axelrod, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Party Crasher #1, Rahm Emanuel, Eric Holder, Party Crasher #2, Harry Reid, John Edwards, Bluto, Andy Stern, Bill Clinton, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Barney Frank, Kevin Jennings

Statues left to right: Che Guevara, Saul Alinsky, Obama, Chairman Mao, Lenin

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Biden Dishes Campaign Cash to Family Member

Democratic vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden has paid more than $2 million in campaign funds to family members, their businesses and employers over the years, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.

The money came from Biden's failed presidential campaign during the past two years. The largest chunk, $1.8 million, was paid to a company that employs his sister and longtime campaign manager, Valerie Biden Owens, according to campaign disclosure filings viewed by The Washington Times.

Biden also gave campaign legal work to a lobbying and law firm co-founded by his son R. Hunter Biden, the filings reveal.

Paying family members and their companies is legal if the work is legitimate and charged at market rates, according to the Federal Election Commission. But public watchdog groups have been critical of such arrangements.

"Even though legal within restraints, it's not something I view as completely ethical," Craig Holman, legislative director for the campaign finance watchdog group Public Citizen, told The Times. "Any candidate ought to shy away from that."

Biden aides say all the payments he has made to family members or their employers were legitimate, and spokesman David Wade told The Times that no Biden family members are being paid by the Obama-Biden campaign.

The $1.8 million paid to his sister’s firm, Joe Slade White & Co., was for media consulting, and much of the money went to produce and air political ads.

Other Biden campaign and political action committee expenditures over the years included more than $50,000 in salary to his sister, and more than $150,000 to Hunter Biden’s Washington lobbying firm Oldaker, Biden & Belair.

Wade asserted that none of the money went to Hunter.

Hunter and Joe Biden’s brother James were accused in two lawsuits of defrauding a former business partner and an investor of millions of dollars in a hedge fund deal that went bad, The Washington Post reported in August.

Hunter and James countered that the former partner defrauded them by misrepresenting his experience in the hedge fund industry and recommending that they hire a lawyer with felony convictions.

Hunter Biden announced in September that he had quit working as a federal lobbyist, amid concerns that his work undermined Barack Obama’s anti-lobbyist rhetoric, the Times noted.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington analyzed campaign filings covering the 2002, 2004 and 2006 election cycles, and its report listed Joe Biden among the top five senators in terms of salaries and fees paid to family members.

By: Jim Meyers© 2008 Newsmax

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Thought For The Day - 10.02.08




The New One Dollar Bill


“Statistics and polls can be spun by anyone who wants to or needs to!”

(So, the trick is to find out who is doing the spinning… and what is real!)

 Biden Secret Service Codename: 'Assassination Insurance'

While Gov. Sarah Palin is being grilled on her position on mark-to-market accounting rules, the press can't bother to ask Joe Biden if he could give us a ballpark estimate on when Franklin D. Roosevelt was president -- or maybe take a stab at guessing the decade when televisions were first available to the public.

Being interviewed by Katie Couric on the "CBS Evening News," Biden said: "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"

For those of you who aren't hard-core history buffs, Biden not only named the wrong president during the 1929 stock market crash, he also claimed a president who wasn't president during the stock market crash went on TV before Americans had TVs.

Other than that, the statement holds up pretty well. At least Biden managed to avoid mentioning any "clean" Negroes he had met.

Couric was nearly moved to tears by the brilliance of Biden's brain-damaged remark. She was especially intrigued by Biden's claim that FDR had said the new iPhone was the bomb!

Here is Couric's full response to Biden's bizarre outburst about FDR (a) being president and (b) going on TV in 1929: "Relating to the fears of the average American is one of Biden's strong suits."

But when our beauteous Sarah said that John McCain was a better leader on the economy than Barack Obama, Couric relentlessly badgered her for evidence. "Why do you say that?" Couric demanded. "Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama? ... Can you give us any more examples of his leading the charge for more oversight?"

The beauteous Sarah had cited McCain's prescient warnings about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But Couric, the crackerjack journalist who didn't know FDR wasn't president in 1929, demanded more examples from Palin.

We are currently in the middle of a massive financial crisis brought on by Fannie Mae. McCain was right on Fannie Mae; Obama was wrong. That's not enough?

Not for the affable Eva Braun of evening TV! "I'm just going to ask you one more time," Couric snipped, "not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation?" 

This would be like responding to someone who predicted the 9/11 attacks by saying: OK, you got one thing right. Not to belabor the point, but what else?

Obama was not merely wrong on Fannie Mae: He is owned by Fannie Mae. Somehow Obama managed to become the second biggest all-time recipient of Fannie Mae political money after only three years in the Senate. The biggest beneficiary, Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, had a 30-year head start on receiving loot from Fannie Mae -- the government-backed institution behind our current crisis.

How does the Democratic ticket stack up on other major issues facing the nation, say, gas prices?

Shockingly, Sen. Joe Biden was one of only five senators to vote against the first Alaskan pipeline bill in 1973. This is like having been a Nazi sympathizer during World War II. If Sarah Palin does nothing else, she has got to tie that idiotic pipeline vote around Biden's neck.

The Senate passed the 1973 Alaskan pipeline bill by an overwhelming 80-5 vote. Only five senators voted against the pipeline on final passage. Sen. Biden is the only one who is still in the Senate -- the other four having been confined to mental institutions long ago.

The stakes were clear: This was in the midst of the first Arab oil embargo. Liberal Democrats, such as senators Robert Byrd, Mike Mansfield, Frank Church and Hubert Humphrey, all voted for the pipeline.

But Biden cast one of only five votes against the pipeline that has produced more than 15 billion barrels of oil, supplied nearly 20 percent of this nation's oil, created tens of thousands of jobs, added hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. economy and reduced money transfers to the nation's enemies by about the same amount.

The only argument against the pipeline was that it would harm the caribou, an argument that was both trivial and wrong. The caribou population near the pipeline increased from 5,000 in the 1970s to 32,000 by 2002.

It would have been bad enough to vote against the pipeline bill even if it had hurt the caribou. A sane person would still say: Our enemies have us in a vice grip. Sorry, caribou, you've got to take one for the team. But when the pipeline goes through and the caribou population sextuples in the next 20 years, you really look like a moron.

We couldn't possibly expect Couric to ask Biden about a vote that is the equivalent of voting against the invention of the wheel. But couldn't she have come up with just one follow-up question for Biden on FDR's magnificent handling of the 1929 stock market crash?

Or here's a question the public is dying to know: "If Obama wanted a historically delusional vice president, why not Lyndon LaRouche?" At least LaRouche didn't vote against the Alaskan pipeline.

The media also keeps telling us that Obama is ahead in the polls by as much as 9 percentage points, because of his ‘handling’ of the present economic crisis… Handling???  He is nowhere around!!  And as we all know, statistics and polls can be interpreted and spun by anyone who wants to and needs to… The fact is that only one poll, that interviewed Democrats to Republicans 2 to 1, shows Obama ahead of McCain by more than 3 percentage points… while others show them from 3 percentage points apart to being in a dead heat, even with all the media spin for Obama and with McCain being off the campaign trail and doing his job in Washington.

By Ann Coulter for NewsMax

“McCain wants to ‘put his country first’. The best way is simple: Get aggressive and win the election!” …Larry Elder, who says McCain needs to take off the gloves! 

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Thought For The Day: 8.28.08

“Politics Makes For Strange Bed Fellows And A Lot of Bed Hopping!!”




It wasn't too long ago though that Barrack Obama’s newfound political allies were telling a different story about Barack Obama.

"You never hear the specifics."
-- Hillary Clinton, speaking about Barrack's Issue Plans

"I think he can be ready, but right now I don't believe he is. The Presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training."
-- Senator Joe Biden, when asked if Barack Obama is ready to be President

"I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience he will bring to the White House--and Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002."
-- Hillary Clinton, about Obama's leadership

"We still don't have a lot of answers."
-- Hillary Clinton, about the Resko scandal


There Can Only Be One
And After Hillary’s Speech at the Democratic Convention, More Democrats Than Ever Are Wondering If They Chose the Right Candidate…