Hundreds Gather to Protest Global Warming; Looks Like A Rather Peaceful Rally

Sign Petition (Instrument of Repudiation) Opposing Treaty of Copenhagen

World Leaders Gather in Copenhagen, During One of Their Coldest Winters Ever, to Push Political Agenda Against Ever Growing Proof That Manmade Global Warming is a Sham. With Climategate Raging and Americans Saying NO to Cap and Trade, the EPA Circumvents the Congress to Give Obama and the American Progressives a Basis to (Again) Give Away the Farm They Stole from the American People.

Legally Non-Binding Climate Deal (That Cost Us Billions) Struck in Copenhagen

Legally Non-Binding Climate Deal Struck in Copenhagen

Obama Announces Non-Binding Climate Agreement, Progress Will ‘Take Some Time’

President Obama has reached a "meaningful agreement" with China, India and South Africa to curb greenhouse gas emissions following a marathon day of talks in Copenhagen, an administration official said late Friday.

Obama had delayed his scheduled departure from Copenhagen and was in the final stages of overseeing the creation of a non-binding agreement to cut global greenhouse gases, the official said. The deal will prevent global temperature increases of no more than two degrees centigrade by 2020, the official said.
The official acknowledged the agreement is "not sufficient" to combat climate change, but called it an "important first step."
"No country is entirely satisfied with each element but this is a meaningful and historic step forward and a foundation from which to make further progress," the official said. Read more here.

Climategate has given Americans the Opportunity to stand up and stop more government control and open the free market to energy options. Step One: Congress must pass legislation to override the EPA’s Declaration.

Related:

Copenhagen Cuts Corners on Climate Change Safeguards
Obama: World's Will on Climate Change 'Hangs in the Balance' at Copenhagen
Coming Soon: An 'International Environmental Organization'?
Blizzard in Copenhagen

Obama's Push for Copenhagen Deal Could Violate Constitution

President Obama's mission to save the planet from global warming could end up trampling on the U.S. Constitution, critics say.

When Obama arrives in Copenhagen Friday, he is hoping to cut a deal on a new global-warming agreement. Even though the conference is not likely to produce a legally binding deal, critics say if the president signs an international climate treaty pledging reductions in carbon emissions, he will violate the Constitution.

"President Obama cannot bind the American people to job killing international agreements on climate change without the advice and consent of the United States Senate," former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich wrote Wednesday at the conservative Web site Human Events.

The Constitution states that the president cannot sign treaties without the approval of two-thirds of the Senate.

But with climate change legislation stuck in the Senate after the House passed its version earlier this year, the White House is flirting with the possibility of taking action without Congress.

Last week, on the day the climate summit opened in Denmark, the EPA formally declared that greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide are a danger to human health -- a finding that could pave the way for massive new regulations under the Clean Air Act for cars, power plants, crude-oil refineries and chemical plants.

While administration officials have said they would prefer Congress take action on regulating greenhouse gas emissions, Republicans fear the EPA, buoyed by its latest finding, is prepared to act unilaterally.

Democratic Rep. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, co-author of the House climate change bill, told Fox News that the Obama administration has the power to act without Congress through the EPA.

"It's no longer a question of legislation or no legislation," he told Fox News' Chris Wallace. "It is now a question of legislation or regulation. The EPA can act.

"And so this is now something which is going to happen. And the only question now is whether or not, as you say, command and control of the EPA is going to be the way in which we solve the problem, or legislation that allows us to protect trade-intensive, energy-intensive industries, to protect consumers."

But Gingrich warned of an uprising if the Obama administration takes action through the EPA.

"Similarly, he can't bypass the peoples' representatives in Congress by having the EPA pursue the same goals through bureaucratic totalitarianism," he wrote.

"This message to the president is also a message to Congress. Should the Obama administration act unilaterally and subvert the Constitution, the American people will rightfully rise up in opposition."

Global leaders were expected to arrive before Friday's summit finale to sign a political outline of a global warming treaty that would set limits on carbon dioxide pollution by the United States, China and India, as well as extend emissions targets for the 37 countries regulated under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which was never ratified by the U.S.

So far, negotiations in Copenhagen have been rocky. The Obama administration is looking to strike a loose agreement on guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions, with a binding treaty to follow sometime in the future.

But Obama has received one warning from a member of his party on signing a treaty. Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., told Obama in a letter late last month not to commit the U.S. to any binding climate standards in Copenhagen without congressional support.

"As you well know from your time in the Senate, only specific legislation agreed upon in the Congress, or a treaty ratified by the Senate, could actually create such a commitment on behalf of our country," he wrote.

Webb's office could not be reached for further comment.

The Center for Biological Diversity Climate Law Institute, however, argues the Supreme Court has given the president the legal authority to bypass Congress and bind the country internationally through an "executive agreement" and that Congress itself has given the president specific authority to negotiate international agreements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In a report, the institute also claims that Obama could "make an international commitment grounded in his power -- and indeed, his duty -- to enforce existing U.S. environmental laws," such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act.

"In short, any one of these sources of authority would allow President Obama to make a binding, meaningful commitment to the international community," the institute wrote in the report, titled "Yes He Can: President Obama's Power to Make an International Climate Commitment Without Waiting for Congress."

"Together, these congressional enactments and environmental statutes give President Obama a very strong hand -- strong enough to do what the science demands, and not just what a divided and rancorous Congress might someday allow."

But others framed Obama's trip to Copenhagen in very different terms.

"Who will President Obama heed?" Vince Haley, vice president of policy at American Solutions for Winning the Future, wrote in an opinion article published in FoxNews.com. "The American people and our constitutional system of checks and balances, or the collection of dictators, tyrants, and most undemocratic heads of government convened by the United Nations in Copenhagen this week?

"They are tempting the American president to do what he wants to do and what they mostly do: ignore the will of their own people and sign a political agreement based on an unconstitutional sham."

FOXNews.com

Mr President, Boycott Copenhagen

From Sarah Palin's Facebook
Mr. President: Boycott Copenhagen; Investigate Your Climate Change "Experts"
Yesterday at 6:17pm

The president’s decision to attend the international climate conference in Copenhagen needs to be reconsidered in light of the unfolding Climategate scandal. The leaked e-mails involved in Climategate expose the unscientific behavior of leading climate scientists who deliberately destroyed records to block information requests, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, and conspired to silence the critics of man-made global warming. I support Senator James Inhofe’s call for a full investigation into this scandal. Because it involves many of the same personalities and entities behind the Copenhagen conference, Climategate calls into question many of the proposals being pushed there, including anything that would lead to a cap and tax plan.

Policy should be based on sound science, not snake oil. I took a stand against such snake oil science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population has increased. I’ve never denied the reality of climate change; in fact, I was the first governor to create a subcabinet position to deal specifically with the issue. I saw the impact of changing weather patterns firsthand while serving as governor of our only Arctic state. But while we recognize the effects of changing water levels, erosion patterns, and glacial ice melt, we cannot primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes. The drastic economic measures being pushed by dogmatic environmentalists won’t change the weather, but will dramatically change our economy for the worse.

Policy decisions require real science and real solutions, not junk science and doomsday scare tactics pushed by an environmental priesthood that capitalizes on the public’s worry and makes them feel that owning an SUV is a “sin” against the planet. In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to “restore science to its rightful place.” Boycotting Copenhagen while this scandal is thoroughly investigated would send a strong message that the United States government will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices. Saying no to Copenhagen and cap and tax are first steps in “restoring science to its rightful place.”

Sarah Palin

North Korea's Currency has Collapsed!

I really don't know want to make of this. If Britain has lost her Sovereignty because their dollar collapsed and Obama is trying hard to destroy our dollar we only have a couple of months. The man says stock up on food, water, guns, ammo and pray to god.

It's always better to be prepared but what happens when the money runs out and the food and the water. God I hope that this does not happen to our country as well. I sent faxes to my senators to ask them to stop Obama from going to Copenhagen.

You can do that much yourself and pray.

The power of a country to control its own government is the meaning of Sovereignty, That is where we are right now. If the dollar crashes like the Korean dollar just did, and the British dollar has already, then we are in big trouble. This is going supposedly to happen in a couple of months. If others want to research this further and have more info than me, then I would like to hear it..but I feel compelled to tell you so you can prepared as one can be prepared when something of this magnitude happens.

We are about to see a coup in all nations as the new global government is trying to take over every nation on the planet. I look for the dollar to collapse in a couple of months. The collapse of the British Pound led to their government to sign the Lisbon Treaty which placed the United Kingdom's National Sovereignty under the global government. They cannot even decide their own fates or national direction. I look for Korea to have a similar treaty signed soon to also be placed under the global government (New World Order).

obama is suppose to go the Copenhagen, Denmark, on Dec 9th to sign the Copenhagen Treaty which will surrender America's National Sovereignty to the global government.

We will then be merged into a new North American Union as Europe was merged into the European Union. Our Constitution will become useless as it will no longer be valid.

When Americans find this out there will be a civil war as Americans will not only refuse to surrender their guns, but they will use them in an effort to re-take our nation and re-establish or constitutional republic.

So stock up on food and water and guns and ammo. And prepare to move to a place closer to some of our units, so you will be safer.

Posted by Woodey on December 3, 2009 at 10:00pm – AsAMom

Related:

United Kingdom Ceased to be a Sovereign State

Do Not Let Them Get Away With This… Climategate is our Warning– C & T Price Tag: $145 Trillion and Your Way of Life…

Fat Albert Visits the Windy City and Is Confronted On His Lies

The snake Al Gore and his inconvenient lies on display. Note the Mercedes SUV at the end. GM is struggling, the least he could do is buy the new Cadillac or GMC hybrid SUV as an American. Oh wait...never mind...he is a traitor.

Can you believe it?? The UK signed away its sovereignty today to the EU (Obama’s Goal is to sign away our sovereignty as well through the Copenhagen Treaty) and even with all the evidence coming out of Climategate… the lame stream media is still not covering it and Sen Inhofe assigned Gore worshipper … Boxer to investigate Climategate for the Senate… Hello??

The good news… yes there is some is that Australia’s Parliament voted down their version of Cap and Trade, after the liberals thought they had it in the bag.

Obama’s Goal is to sign away our sovereignty as well through the Copenhagen Treaty

Keep praying and pressuring Congress my friends, the tide is turning.

Are You Willing to Pay $145 Trillion for a Program Shrouded in Lies?

Yes, you read that right… Cap and Trade… leading to the Copenhagen Treaty… leading to the full implementation of the United Nation’s Agenda 21 Treaty (already signed and started) would cost $147 Trillion Dollars

And even with the lack of scientific evidence and the release of the emails proving the data rape, lies of parties involved and the destruction of the supposed information that the entire belief (or scam) of man-made global warming is based… our two uber liberal Senators – Boxer and Kerry are still trying to cram a cap and trade bill through the Senate.

The Earth has been cooling for almost 11 years now and the general belief in the scientific community is that the warming before that was not caused by man.

Climategate’s “Harry Read Me” File is a Must Read!

As another pundit said: this isn’t just the smoking gun pointing to the fraud of global warming, it’s a mushroom cloud!

As researchers around the world report on their findings in the hacked emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain you often hear references to the infamous “Harry Read Me” file. The entire file, 247 pages long, is an encyclopedia chronicling the absolute mess that temperature records, upon which much global warming theory is based, are in.

-----------

Lord Christopher Monckton releases the definitive report on ClimateGate

The whistleblower deep in the basement of one of the ugly, modern tower-blocks of the dismal, windswept University of East Anglia could scarcely have timed it better.

In less than three weeks, the world’s governing class – its classe politique – would meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss a treaty to inflict an unelected and tyrannical global government on us, with vast and unprecedented powers to control all once-free world markets and to tax and regulate the world’s wealthier nations for its own enrichment: in short, to bring freedom, democracy, and prosperity to an instant end worldwide, at the stroke of a pen, on the pretext of addressing what is now known to be the non-problem of manmade “global warming.”read more…

by F. Swemson

--------------

‘Botch after botch after botch’
Leaked ‘climategate’ documents show huge flaws in the backbone of climate change science
By LORRIE GOLDSTEIN
Toronto Sun
29th November 2009

…The file — 274 pages long — describes the efforts of a climatologist/programmer at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia to update a huge statistical database (11,000 files) of important climate data between 2006 and 2009.

The computer coding, along with the programmer’s apparently unsuccessful efforts to complete the project, involve data that are the foundation of the study of climate change — recordings from hundreds of weather stations around the world of temperature and precipitation measurements from 1901 to 2006, sun/cloud computer simulations, and the like.
…
The CRU at East Anglia University is considered by many as the world’s leading climate research agency. Here’s how CBSNews.com…’s Declan McCullagh describes its enormous impact on policymakers:

“In global warming circles, the CRU wields outsize influence: It claims the world’s largest temperature data set, and its work and mathematical models were incorporated into the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 report. The report … is what the Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged it ‘relies on most heavily’ when concluding carbon dioxide emissions endanger public health and should be regulated.”

As you read the programmer’s comments below, remember, this is only a fraction of what he says.

- “But what are all those monthly files? DON’T KNOW, UNDOCUMENTED. Wherever I look, there are data files, no info about what they are other than their names. And that’s useless …” (Page 17)

- “It’s botch after botch after botch.” (18)
- “The biggest immediate problem was the loss of an hour’s edits to the program, when the network died … no explanation from anyone, I hope it’s not a return to last year’s troubles … This surely is the worst project I’ve ever attempted. Eeeek.” (31)

- “Oh, GOD, if I could start this project again and actually argue the case for junking the inherited program suite.” (37)

- “… this should all have been rewritten from scratch a year ago!” (45)

- “Am I the first person to attempt to get the CRU databases in working order?!!” (47)

- “As far as I can see, this renders the (weather) station counts totally meaningless.” (57)

- “COBAR AIRPORT AWS (data from an Australian weather station) cannot start in 1962, it didn’t open until 1993!” (71)

- “What the hell is supposed to happen here? Oh yeah — there is no ’supposed,’ I can make it up. So I have : – )” (98)

- “You can’t imagine what this has cost me — to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO (World Meteorological Organization) codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a ‘Master’ database of dubious provenance …” (98)

- “So with a somewhat cynical shrug, I added the nuclear option — to match every WMO possible, and turn the rest into new stations … In other words what CRU usually do. It will allow bad databases to pass unnoticed, and good databases to become bad …” (98-9)

- “OH F— THIS. It’s Sunday evening, I’ve worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done, I’m hitting yet another problem that’s based on the hopeless state of our databases.” (241).

- “This whole project is SUCH A MESS …” (266)

The Devil’s Kitchen calls this “data horribilia” and rightly so. Lorrie Goldstein concludes her piece by saying what many of us have over the years: “And based on stuff like this, politicians are going to blow up our economy and lower our standard of living to “fix” the climate? Are they insane?”

Canadian blogger Small Dead Animals has also been covering the story in detail with a number of excellent resources.

UN Digs In

Meanwhile, over at the United Nations, an organization which stands to rake in billions if the Warmers agenda for global warming is enacted, they are digging in for a fight:

Leaked emails won’t harm UN climate body, says chairman Rajendra Pachaurisays there is ‘virtually no possibility’ of a few scientists biasing IPCC’s advice, after UAE hacking breach
By James Randerson
Guardian.co.uk,
Sunday 29 November 2009

[Mike's note: Would YOU trust this guy?]

There is “virtually no possibility” of a few scientists biasing the advice given to governments by the UN’s top global warming body, its chair said today.

Rajendra Pachauri defended the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the wake of apparent suggestions in emails between climate scientists at the University of East Anglia that they had prevented work they did not agree with from being included in the panel’s fourth assessment report, which was published in 2007.

The emails were made public this month after a hacker illegally obtained them from servers at the university.

Pachauri said the large number of contributors and rigorous peer review mechanism adopted by the IPCC meant that any bias would be rapidly uncovered.

“The processes in the IPCC are so robust, so inclusive, that even if an author or two has a particular bias it is completely unlikely that bias will find its way into the IPCC report,” he said.

What absolute bunk! From the very beginning of the global warming story we’ve seen example after example which confirms how the UN climate panel process has been corrupted. The hacked emails simply confirm what we have known all along. This isn’t about science, it’s about money and power.

What we are likely to find is that the mess at CRU-East Anglia is also replicated at the other big Warmer data factories since their conclusions are all very similar. The only way to be sure is to have an open and transparent investigation of ALL the major data centers doing this work in the United States, Great Britain and elsewhere.

There is absolutely no reason to proceed with any further world plans to address global warming with this kind of doubt, corruption and incompetence on such full display!

Obama Propose Reduction of Carbon Emissions to 2005 levels at Copenhagn – Probably Impossible, will make no difference in global warming or cooling and with be the final nail in the US financial coffin

UK Climate Scientist to Step Down Temporarily – Pending Investigation

Time to move on…. End the swindle!

Hopenhagen... Please Sign Petition

PICTORIAL HISTORY OF OUR FUTURE DEMISE-FROM BEGINNING TO END (SCHEDULED FOR DEC 31, 2009)

Links you need to explore: Club of Rome & Codex Alimentarious/Earth Charter/UNESCO…

Agenda 21 - Video

AGENDA 21 - DEPOPULATION 2009 PART 1 Continue - Video

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty? - Video

AGENDA 21 Videos and Why Are Americans IGNORANT of 'AGENDA 21'?

The United Nations Agenda 21 was signed by the United States in 1992 and 17 years later, people are still in the dark. If you were to ask at random the question, "Have you heard of Agenda 21?" the answer would be an over-whelming "No," although it is being implemented in every local community. (Although with the threat of Cap and Trade being crammed down our throats and the threat of Obama signing the Climate Change Bill in Copenhagen in about a month if we don’t stop him… a few people are finally paying attention and doing some research as to the real meaning.  There is also the threat of the United Nations Rights of the Child treaty being signed… which will take your parental rights and shift them to the U.N.).

Agenda 21 is a 40 chapter document listing goals to be achieved globally. It is the global plan to change the way we "live, eat, learn and communicate" because we must "save the earth."  It is the game plan to get to a NWO.

"Its regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation - even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system," according to Berit Kjos, author of Brave New Schools, which will be hard to find a copy of… one of the books the powers that be has tried to pull off the shelves.

Maurice Strong, Secretary-general of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro said, "...[C]urrent lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat consumption and large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations.

In other words, the Global plan is for us to live on the level of third world nations. That means no box mixes or microwave meals, limited use of fuel of any kind, no air-conditioning and very little meat. When the cost of freon skyrocketed, when mad cow disease hit, the National Animal Identification System introduced, the price of fuel soared, it has become apparent that given time, these sustainable controls will be put into place - one way or another - and the Global Governance is powerful.

In 1992, Agenda 21 began to change our lives. In that same year, Al Gore wrote his book, Earth in the Balance. To advance his cause, he has now written another piece of fiction entitled, An Inconvenient Truth about global warming…..he even starred in the movie. He also thinks he invented the internet.

Although groundwork had been laid, it took a Bill Clinton to actually introduce something so invasive to our nation and get by with it without the public becoming aware. President Clinton appointed his "President’s Council on Sustainable Development" and he literally gave away the rights and freedoms the framers of the Constitution had provided (and we weren’t paying attention).

People in the United States may not know about Agenda 21 and the President’s Council on Sustainable Development, but people around the world do. They know that Chicago has one of the greatest numbers of activities existing at the local, neighborhood and/or microregional level. They also know that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors and promotes activities in this field through their Office for Sustainable Ecosystem and Communities.

Found on a Slovakian website: "To the leading countries in the field of development but especially of practical using of sustainable development indicators belong to the U.S.A. At the top level these activities are promoted by the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (1996), which defined a set of ten national goals toward sustainable development. These goals express in concrete terms the elements of sustainability. Alongside the goals are suggested indicators that can be used to help measure progress toward achieving them.”

Agenda 21 is certainly not a secret. The internet is full of how Agenda 21 has been fulfilled through Smart Growth planning, land use, sustainable development and extreme environmentalism. The so-called agenda is grant driven to your city council or county board in terms of sustainable, visioning, partners, tourism and stakeholders, along with consensus and other terms with the intent to make you believe we are running out of all our resources and we must do our part and "save for tomorrow. [See Agenda 21's Table of Contents.]

It has nothing to do about “saving anything” – it has everything to do with “control.” (Just like ObamaCare has nothing to do with Healthcare reform – has to do with power or 1/6 of US economy that will be used for things other than your healthcare.)  Sadly, very few congressmen even know Agenda 21 is actually running our country when they are voting to send grant money back home. Agenda 21 is incentive driven as the planners know that greed in the heart of man will be his downfall.

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, better known as ANWR, has oil we need to be drilling for the security of our nation.

Environmentalists don’t seem to understand we are dependent on foreign oil from nations who do not like us and our nation’s defense is at stake. The area where drilling would occur is just a dot in this vast land, yet they would gamble the strength of our nation in behalf of their favorite word --"pristine." (Obama is on board with allowing China and Brazil to drill in the waters offshore of Florida… but we cannot.  We also promote nuclear energy plants for Africa but we are not allowed to build anymore.  And we have enough oil shale to be independent until we develop in increase our other source, but the government keeps turning the oil shale areas into parks that would allow it to be touched in the name of conservation).

At the same time, technology is advancing and we may not need the oil later. But we do need it now.

Henry Lamb of Eco-logic, Restructuring the U.N.,

The world changed on 9-11. No longer can the world tilt at the windmills of a fantasized "global village." No longer can visions of "sustainable development" be justified in a world where "sustainable freedom" is the only possible solution to the economic and power vacuum that foments acts of terrorism.

There is a better way.

Nations can and, ultimately, must learn to live as neighbors, free from the web of "international laws" that dictate which activities are "sustainable" and which are xenophobic and unacceptable. Nation-to-nation relationships, just like neighbor-to-neighbor relationships, should be fashioned voluntarily, driven by mutual benefit. For the first time in a century, the United States may be exploring this possibility.

Henry Lamb is right. We can live as neighbors with other nations but we do not need to live under a "web of international law." There are dedicated citizens in the United States who are wise enough to set our nation’s guidelines without following Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development as set forth by the United Nations.
[See DVD: Liberty or Sustainable Development?]

One of the main goals of Agenda 21 is to redistribute the wealth to third world countries and to bring our great nation to its knees in the name of socialism, fascism, communism or some other “ism.” (Ding ding ding… one of Obama’s cries: Redistribute the Wealth).

Our founding fathers founded this nation on the belief of a Sovereign God and we have been blessed. Do you know the Gods of the nations to which we would become equal? (see Videos Below)

By: Joyce Morrison
August 6, 2006
NewsWithViews.com

© 2006 Joyce Morrison - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts

E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Joyce Morrison attempts to educate the public regarding the dangers coming to their local communities through Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 programs which are designed to gradually take control of all private property through undue regulations.

Morrison writes for Eco-logic Powerhouse, NewsWithViews.com, Range Magazine, SOWER magazine as well as numerous other publications. She is a weekly participant on the teleconference of the Illinois Policy Institute, a conservative think tank and is a pro-life, pro-family activist.

She is a chapter leader for Concerned Women for America as well as Secretary to the Board of Directors of Rural Restoration/ADOPT Mission, a national farm ministry located in Sikeston, MO.  FarmersRuralRestoration.com. Her most enjoyable time is spent teaching a senior adult Sunday School class which is a focus on hope and encouragement.

AGENDA 21 VIDEOS

Agenda 21 - by pincerpal

AGENDA 21 - DEPOPULATION 2009 PART 1 - Video

Related:

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?

We Have Until December…

Immigration Updates

	When squarely presented with the opportunity to make E-Verify a permanent program, Congressional leaders balked. During conference negotiations with leaders of the House, protection was limited to just three years. READ THE ARTICLE
	Gutierrez Outlines “Core Principles” for Forthcoming Amnesty Bill | At an October 13 Capitol rally and news conference, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) unveiled his “core principles.” He signaled that these principles will constitute the core of an illegal alien amnesty bill he intends to introduce. READ THE ARTICLE
	Homeland Security Aims to Weaken Immigration Detention System | Under the guise of “reform,” the administration is taking steps to minimize the number of deportable aliens who will be held in detention. READ THE ARTICLE
	FAIR Report Evaluates the Continued Failure to Address Weaknesses in Enforcement | Many of the vulnerabilities that continue to leave our nation exposed relate to our failure to enforce immigration laws and secure vital identity documents, finds a new report from FAIR, entitled Backsliding on National Security. READ THE ARTICLE

No Country Can Survive if it Does Not Control Immigration and Protect Its Sovereignty!!

“Every country has the duty and obligation to protect its borders and the safety of  its people!!  In order to protect the safety and values of its system and government and the quality of life and safety of its people… a government has the obligation to secure its borders and limit or prevent the influx of individual people and groups that threaten its way of life in all maters!”

“Countries who do not protect its people and sovereignty eventually die or have to pass laws to keep their people in… like the Communist and Fascist Countries of the world past and present, then no longer does anyone fight to get in…”

America for Sale:  Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty

Arguing with Idiots

Related:

Schwarzenegger Blocks Bill Barring Cities and Counties from Using E-Verify

Amnesty Would Likely Increase Illegal Immigration Finds Poll of Mexicans

DHS Admits Just 10 Percent of Borders Secured with No Plan to Improve in 2010

Homeland Security Gearing Up to Process Amnesty Applications

Do You Know What (Is In) Textbooks Your Children are Really Reading #3

Muslim Demographics

Sharia Trumps Yale’s Free Speech and Free Speech in General – Time to Pay Attention

Source:  Federation for American Immigration Reform