CBS: Memos Show Kagan 'Stood Shoulder to Shoulder with the Liberal Left'
By: Brad Wilmouth - June 04, 2010 01:13 ET
On Thursday’s CBS Evening News, correspondent Jan Crawford filed a report recounting revelations that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan has a history of taking solidly liberal positions on issues like abortion, gay rights, and gun control – with evidence in the form of memos, some going back to her days working for liberal Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall.
Crawford: "Documents buried in Thurgood Marshall's papers in the Library of Congress show that, as a young lawyer, Kagan stood shoulder to shoulder with the liberal left, including on the most controversial issue Supreme Court nominees ever confront: abortion."
The CBS correspondent informed viewers that Kagan had fretted about conservatives restricting abortion rights: "In a case involving a prisoner who wanted the state to pay for her to have the procedure, Kagan writes to Marshall that the conservative-leaning court could use the case to rule against the woman and ‘create some very bad law on abortion.’"
Notably, on Monday, May 10, as the broadcast network evening newscasts introduced Kagan to their viewers, only CBS referred to her liberal ideology,as Crawford asserted: "Her career has put her solidly on the left."
In addition to having suggested that she sees a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Kagan had also admitted that "I’m not sympathetic" to a lawsuit challenging the D.C. gun ban as unconstitutional. Crawford: "A recently disclosed memo on gun rights, in a case challenging the District of Columbia's handgun ban as unconstitutional, Kagan was blunt: ‘I'm not sympathetic.’"
Crawford predicted that the revelations would have a significant impact on her confirmation hearings: "Taken together, these documents will be much harder for her to explain away than other less controversial papers unearthed before her confirmation hearings for solicitor general. ... But the documents seem to show that Kagan had some pretty strong legal views of her own, and, while that may encourage liberals, it's going to give Republicans a lot more ammunition to fight against her."
Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Thursday, June 3, CBS Evening News:
—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.KATIE COURIC: The Senate is scheduled to begin confirmation hearings at the end of this month for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan. Kagan has never been a judge, but she did clerk for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall. And in this exclusive report, chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford tells us she does have a paper trail.
JAN CRAWFORD: Elena Kagan has kept her cards so close to the vest that some on the left have worried she's too moderate.
ELENA KAGAN, SUPREME COURT NOMINEE: Everybody's treated me very well.
CRAWFORD: But documents buried in Thurgood Marshall's papers in the Library of Congress show that, as a young lawyer, Kagan stood shoulder to shoulder with the liberal left, including on the most controversial issue Supreme Court nominees ever confront: abortion.
CLIP OF PROTESTERS: Abortion's got to go!
CRAWFORD: In a case involving a prisoner who wanted the state to pay for her to have the procedure, Kagan writes to Marshall that the conservative-leaning court could use the case to rule against the woman and "create some very bad law on abortion." She expressed strong views in a school desegregation case, calling a school busing plan "amazingly sensible." She said state court decisions upholding the plan recognized the "good sense and fair mindedness" of local efforts adding, "Let's hope this court takes not of the same."
Kagan also wrote a memo Republicans will use to say she found a constitutional right to gay marriage. That case involved a man who said the state of New York was required to recognize his marriage in Kansas, even though it was illegal in New York. Kagan told Marshall his position was "arguably correct." And then, a recently disclosed memo on gun rights, in a case challenging the District of Columbia's handgun ban as unconstitutional, Kagan was blunt: "I'm not sympathetic." Taken together, these documents will be much harder for her to explain away than other less controversial papers unearthed before her confirmation hearings for solicitor general. At the time, she said:
KAGAN, DATED FEBRUARY 10, 2009: I was a 27-year-old pipsqueak, and I was working for an 80-year-old giant in the law, and a person who, let us be frank, had very strong jurisprudential and legal views.
CRAWFORD: But the documents seem to show that Kagan had some pretty strong legal views of her own, and, while that may encourage liberals, it's going to give Republicans a lot more ammunition to fight against her.
----------------
EXCLUSIVE: Documents Show Kagan's Liberal Opinion on Social Issues
Elena Kagan has kept her cards so close to the vest that in the days after President Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court, some on the left worried she was too moderate to replace liberal Justice John Paul Stevens.
But in documents obtained by CBS News, Kagan--while working as a law clerk to the late Justice Thurgood Marshall - made her positions clear on some of the nation's most contentious social issues.
The documents, buried in Marshall's papers in the Library of Congress, show Kagan standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the liberal left, at a time when the Rehnquist Supreme Court was moving to the conservative right.
They also provide a remarkably candid picture of her opinions, including on the most controversial issue Supreme Court nominees ever confront: abortion.
Although Kagan's confirmation has thus far been an all but foregone conclusion, sources say these documents will give Republicans a few cards of their own to mount a strong fight against her.
And they will only heighten demands for more information on her views--including interest in her papers in the Clinton Library. Some of the Clinton Library documents, which cover her time working in that administration, could be released as early as Friday.
CBSNews.com Special Report: Elena Kagan
Photo Gallery: Elena Kagan's Life in Pictures
The Marshall documents are legal memos summarizing cases the Court had been asked to consider. They cover the spectrum of hot-button social issues: abortion, civil rights, gun rights, prisoners' rights and the constitutional underpinnings for recognizing gay marriage.
On abortion, Kagan wrote a memo in a case involving a prisoner who wanted the state to pay for her to have the procedure. Kagan expressed concern to Marshall that the conservative-leaning Court would use the case to rule against the woman--and possibly undo precedents protecting a woman's right to abortion.
"This case is likely to become the vehicle that this court uses to create some very bad law on abortion and/or prisoners' rights," she wrote in the 1988 memo.
She also expressed strong liberal views in a desegregation case. Summarizing a challenge to a voluntary school desegregation program, Kagan called the program "amazingly sensible." She told Marshall that state court decisions that upheld the plan recognized the "good sense and fair-mindedness" of local efforts.
"Let's hope this Court takes note of the same," she wrote in the 1987 memo. Just three years ago, the Supreme Court struck down a nearly identical plan.
Poll: Most Americans Still Unfamiliar with Elena Kagan
Kagan's Stance on DADT at Harvard Ambiguous
Kagan also wrote a memo that senators could use to question whether she believes there is a constitutional right to gay marriage.
That memo summarized a 1988 case involving a prisoner serving a life sentence in New York. He argued the state of New York was required to recognize his marriage-by-proxy in Kansas - even though such marriages were illegal in New York.
The basis of his argument was that New York had a duty under the Constitution's Full Faith and Credit Clause to recognize his Kansas the marriage as valid. Kagan told Marshall his position was "at least arguably correct," and recommended asking for a response from New York officials.
Then there was the recently disclosed memo on gun rights. In a case challenging the District of Columbia's handgun ban as unconstitutional, Kagan was blunt: "I am not sympathetic." The Supreme Court took the opposite approach two years ago, striking down the D.C. gun ban as unconstitutional.
Taken together, these documents are certain to provoke considerably more questions than the less controversial papers unearthed before her confirmation hearings for solicitor general.
Watch CBS News Videos Online - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6545676n&tag=api
In those 2009 hearings, she explained she was merely trying to reflect Marshall's views when she wrote memos to him.
"I was a 27-year-old pipsqueak, and I was working for an 80-year-old giant in the law, and a person who, let us be frank, had very strong jurisprudential and legal views," Kagan testified.
(at left, watch Crawford's report on the Kagan documents on the CBS Evening News)
But these memos, often written in the first-person, show a more personal approach that suggests she shared many of Marshall's opinions.
In a case involving prisoners' rights, for example, Kagan criticized a 1984 Supreme Court decision--Strickland v. Washington - which set tough new standards for convicted criminals to argue they were denied effective assistance of counsel. Marshall and another liberal icon, Justice William Brennan, were the only dissenters in that case, written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
"I'd like to reverse Strickland too," Kagan wrote in her memo to Marshall three years later, "but something tells me this court won't buy the idea."
Update June 4: Here are the documents from the Marshall papers (all in PDF format):
- Kagan's abortion memo, expressing concern the conservative Court will use a prisoner's appeal to "create some very bad law on abortion."
- Memo on "amazingly sensible" school desegregation program
- Memo requiring states to recognize marriages from other states, saying the argument was at least "arguably correct."
- Gun rights: "I'm not sympathetic."
- Criminals' rights: wishes Court "would reverse" ineffective assistance of counsel ruling making it harder for criminals to challenge their convictions.
We are hearing ridiculous comments from the GOP, that they aren’t going to use all methods at hand like a filibuster to stop Kagan’s confirmation, because she is replacing a liberal judge. We are hearing from Democratic moderates that Kagan is really not that liberal. And we are hearing from Senators on both sides who seem too lazy or somehow too tired to fight that approving a president’s nominations for the Supreme Court are part of the price the American people for their choice. Here is Why We Dare Not Give Kagan a Free Pass On the Road to the Supreme Court and below is a video debate between Ann Coulter and Bill Maher from 2004 showing that both sides were more than happy to fight Bush’s nomination in 2004. The Dems because they hated Bush and thought the pick was anti Roe vs. Wade and the GOP because although they liked her Roe vs. Wade stance, there were other principles and issues.
So where are these Senators today???
As more and more questionable info is found and released about Kagan… we are hearing that “they” might not have time to research it all. Really??? How about blocking the vote and postponing it until they are ready rather than saddling America with anti-Constitutional far left judge that most Americans don’t want?
Video: Coulter vs. Maher in Oct 2004
Kagen is far too left for the majority of Americans and will hold that position far too long, just to let her be confirmed because nobody was will to fight.
Time to call your Senators and tell them to vote no on Kagan and do whatever it takes to block her confirmation!!
No comments:
Post a Comment