Showing posts with label Washington Post Admits Media Favoritisn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington Post Admits Media Favoritisn. Show all posts

Friday, May 11, 2012

Washington Post Quickly Redacting Sensational But Untrue Romney Story

May 10, 2012

Seems obviously Obama Controlled newspaper Washington Post created an untrue story about Romney and bullying that never happened just in time for Team Obama to use it (to vilify Romney) as part of the Obama’s calculated announcement of Obama’s personal support of gay marriage.  This 17-page fabricated story by the Washington Post should be a good warning of what we are in for this upcoming election season.  Team Obama and their government controlled media minions obviously will say and do anything to make their point regardless of the truth.  This should worry anyone and everyone who loves America and respects the Constitution and values any type of  decency.

When we get to the point that the press cannot be trusted to do their job, tell the and are controlled by the government, the loss of freedom is right around the corner!  The only way to correct that is to cancel your subscription and stop buying and reading the papers, magazines, or watching the news programs who do and have lied.  The Washington Post (as well as Team Obama) has just proved again that they can’t be trusted or believed.  How about a few of these news sources start by honestly vetting the President, which they didn’t do in 2008.

Whoa: Family of Romney’s Alleged Bullying “Victim” Says Story Inaccurate, They’re Disgusted by WaPo

by Stephan Tawney on May 10, 2012

Ashley Parker of the New York Times has a statement from the family of John Lauber, the man the Washington Post claimed Mitt Romney bullied in high school. She tweets:

From John Lauber’s family, the bullied victim in WaPo story: “We are aggrieved that John would be used to further a political agenda.”

Also from John Lauber’s family: “The portrayal of John is factually incorrect,” but they would not elaborate on how it was inaccurate.

This comes after one source for the story, a man the Washington Post says has “long been bothered” by the incident, said he wasn’t even present and had no idea it had happened until the Post contacted him.

It’s increasingly clear that the Washington Post either misreported or simply lied about the story in an attempt to hurt the Romney campaign. Someone needs to be held accountable by the newspaper.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post is quietly airbrushing passages in the story

Washington Post Caught Making

Sh!t Up Again

Remember when Gov. Rick Perry of Texas was looking like a viable candidate?

Oh God, please don't remind me...I'm almost over it....

Yeah, sorry about this Rick, but it's gotta be done. Just as Perry was getting his campaign moving the Washington Post decided this would be a perfect time to dredge up some useless fact from decades in the past about a piece of land the Perry family leased to hunt on that had this big rock with a racial slur painted on it.

The MSM spent over a week flogging the story to death from coast to coast despite the fact that if you looked at the details you would notice:

1. The Perry family only leased a part of the land, they did not own it, it did not belong to them.

2. They did not paint the offensive slur on the rock.

3. The rock was painted over long ago.

But this apparently was the only way the MSM could tie 'Rick Perry' and the word 'N***r' together in the same sentence and hey, you have to work with what you get. So we got days 'n days of outrageous OUTRAGE!!! over this LAND THAT THE PERRY FAMILY OWNED where they had PAINTED THIS TERRIBLE WORD n stuff!

Today the Washington Post thought it would be a great idea to look back into Mitt Romney's school days way back in 1965 at some pranks he did as a kid.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romneys-prep-school-classmates-recall-pranks-but-also-troubling-incidents/2012/05/10/gIQA3WOKFU_print.html

There are several real problems with that article, but thus far here's the main one that has developed over this particular passage about a prank where Romney cut another student's hair:

Click for larger image of Stu White being troubled for years by Lauber incident

Stu White was interviewed today after WaPo put that article up about the cutting of Lauber's hair. What did he say about it? 

Click for larger image showing WaPo reporter Jason Horowitz to be a lying hack

OOPS! Retracto, the Amazing Retraction Alpaca at Big Journalism has contacted WaPo reporter Jason Horowitz to ask 'Hey Dude, WTF?!':

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/05/10/Retracto-Romney-Bully

Waiting to see if a retraction/correction occurs. Stay tuned!

UPDATE!

When I checked the WaPo article again at 9:40 pm CST, it has now been changed to read this way:

Nowhere in the article does the Washington Post admit they have made a retraction/correction to the news story.

UPDATE II: ....and the story just keeps falling apart:

Now one of Lauber's sisters says she had no knowledge whatsoever of any bullying incident: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/sister-of-alleged-romney-target-has-no-knowledge-of-any-bullying-incident/#.T6yUKQh3n2E.twitter

Retracto the Correction Alpaca is back from vacation, tanned (as much as any alpaca can be), rested, and is taking up the case. He/her/it is going to be working overtime in the coming months.

Posted by Ed Driscoll at 11:37 pm

Draw and Strike

Related:

Obama’s Gay Marriage Distraction

Obama’s Marriage Masquerade

SNL Scraps Skit Bashing Obama – Run Anti-FOX News Skit Instead

SNL cuts sketch critical of Obama, replaces it with Fox News parody

Virginia -Pilot newspaper and local Police cover up a racist based attack?

Many blacks beat white couple, media bury attack
O’Reilly Factor Continues Multi-Part Report On Racialy-Charged ...

16-Year-Old Arrested in Mob Attack on Two White Reporters — Charged with ‘Throwing a Missile’

Flip-Flopping We Can Believe In

Thought for the day:  When Republicans change their mind they are flip-floppers.  When Democrats change their mind they are evolving.

When reporters misreport they are liars or traitors.

So… Does WaPo Know Obama Shoved a Little Girl? Where is that ‘true’ story?

Obama admits: yeah, I bullied a little girl

The press dutifully dug up a story (a mostly false story) that Mitt Romney used to bully gay kids when he was a teenager - but they failed, once again, to read Barack Obama’s own memoir, Dreams from My Father. In it, he explicitly describes bullying a young girl and shoving her to the ground. Is this a composite of all the women he’s beaten in his life? Get the full story.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Washington Post: On second thought, maybe we were a little too Pro-Obama

It’s not like this is news to us.

The op-ed page ran far more laudatory opinion pieces on Obama, 32, than on Sen. John McCain, 13. There were far more negative pieces (58) about McCain than there were about Obama (32), and Obama got the editorial board’s endorsement. The Post has several conservative columnists, but not all were gung-ho about McCain.

Stories and photos about Obama in the news pages outnumbered those devoted to McCain. Post reporters, photographers and editors — like most of the national news media — found the candidacy of Obama, the first African American major-party nominee, more newsworthy and historic. Journalists love the new; McCain, 25 years older than Obama, was already well known and had more scars from his longer career in politics.

The number of Obama stories since Nov. 11 was 946, compared with McCain’s 786. Both had hard-fought primary campaigns, but Obama’s battle with Hillary Rodham Clinton was longer, and the numbers reflect that.

Full Story:

It has been less than a week since “He who has not been vetted” became our President-elect. While the citizen journalists who volunteer time on blogs like this and others have done their best to search for answers about the man who will be our 44th president, they simply did not have the time and resources to uncover much and certainly did not have the ability to share what they did find with an American public that has a right to know.

The readers of No Quarter understand that the Free Press is one of the institutions that helped take America from a fledgling group of colonies and in just a little over 230 years transform us into one of the great empires in history. We are also aware that that particular institution is in as deep a decline as is our nation. The two go hand in hand.

The main steam media (MSM) let all of us down in this election season and if Barack Obama is not up to the job, they will be largely responsible for helping continue the American decline that the Bush team has so skillfully worked on for the last eight years.

So today, when the Washington Post via their ombudsman admits they were a bit Pro-Obama, it does not make me feel better. The wounds are too deep for an I told you so to clot the bleeding. Nope, after reading the piece from Deborah Howell, I am just even more pissed off.

Read the story here:  

It’s not like this is news to us.

The op-ed page ran far more laudatory opinion pieces on Obama, 32, than on Sen. John McCain, 13. There were far more negative pieces (58) about McCain than there were about Obama (32), and Obama got the editorial board’s endorsement. The Post has several conservative columnists, but not all were gung-ho about McCain.

Stories and photos about Obama in the news pages outnumbered those devoted to McCain. Post reporters, photographers and editors — like most of the national news media — found the candidacy of Obama, the first African American major-party nominee, more newsworthy and historic. Journalists love the new; McCain, 25 years older than Obama, was already well known and had more scars from his longer career in politics.

The number of Obama stories since Nov. 11 was 946, compared with McCain’s 786. Both had hard-fought primary campaigns, but Obama’s battle with Hillary Rodham Clinton was longer, and the numbers reflect that.

And the Post is not alone. Newsweek’s Meacham and Thomas admitted this week to Charley Rose they have been troubled a bit by the somewhat creepy nature of Obama’s singular being and his hold on his devoted followers. Tom Brokaw opined that he really does not know much at all about our President-elect.

Predictably, now that the man has been elected, the MSM will admit the error of their ways as a way to hedge their bets, just in case things go south. Then they can puff up their chests and say they were right all along. The problem is, no one is buying it anymore. Even many of those who have consumed copious amounts of “Barry Berry Kool Aid” admit the MSM has been in the tank from day one.

The mea culpas are too late, the damage is done. Whatever shred of credibility the MSM once had is as dead and buried as Tim Russert.

The MSM must now be looked upon for entertainment purposes only. Those interested in uncovering the truth must look elsewhere. You can look around the net, there is a lot out there, but who knows what to trust? You can stick with us at No Quarter, our resources are meager, we have but time and our hearts to give, but we will be keep digging. We won’t get everything right, but we will keep an open mind and look at both sides of everything.

Most importantly do not keep your beliefs to yourself. Citizen silence can kill great nations. Keep spreading the word. Door to door, e-mail to e-mail, blog to blog. It is the only way to combat a free press that is no longer free.