Showing posts with label Dwight D. Eisenhower. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dwight D. Eisenhower. Show all posts

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Democrats’ History of Racism

clip_image001

by B. Christopher Agee   -   Western Journalism

Here's a bit of American history guaranteed not to appear in any government-approved history book. The Democrat party has, throughout its existence, represented the bigotry and racism they seek to project onto Republicans.

The informed readers of this article are likely familiar with the racist roots of the political party aptly portrayed by a jackass, but much of the general population, especially outspoken Democrats, are woefully ignorant of any such facts.

Ask the nearest Democrat about Republicans and race and even the mayor of a substantial American city might just respond with, "They are racist."

In reference to their own party, Dems will likely say they led the fight for civil rights throughout the years, though a cursory review of the party will prove this assertion wrong. For instance, this was the party that established the Ku Klux Klan as its enforcement arm. Powerful Democrat politicians have appointed klansmen to high-ranking positions in American government for a century, yet have somehow convinced the vast majority of blacks that Republicans are the bad guys!

The KKK was used to intimidate voters, black and white, into voting Democrat - or not voting at all.

Through violence, property damage, rape, and murder, Democrats were able to secure a huge majority of the black vote comprised of those afraid to cast an alternate ballot. Disgustingly, they have somehow been able to maintain that death-grip on the African-American community to this day.

When these reprehensible strategies, though unquestionably effective, did not satiate their need to keep the black population down, Democrat-supported legislation such as Jim Crow laws made sure these minorities would remain second-class citizens even after the ratification of the 13th Amendment. There are plenty of examples of heralded Democrats, including Presidents LBJ and Truman, expressing disdain for blacks in their own words.

Republicans, thankfully, emerged as the pro-freedom, anti-slavery alternative to the juggernaut that was the Democrat party. Despite the fact that significantly more Republicans supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act than did Democrats (and the fact that Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower was the first to initiate the legislation which finally passed and was enacted under Democrat Presidents JFK and LBJ), the party of the left has somehow hoodwinked much of the black community into thinking they are its savior. In fact until the passing of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Martin Luther King was a Republican, re-registering as a Democrat as part of the negotiations, and so were most blacks Republicans (the party of Abraham Lincoln) until that time. Facts like these are part of the reason the Progressives consistently fight to re-write and edit the history that is taught and skew media productions.

Of course, today's Democrats will say, if they concede these points at all, that this is all ancient history, but I respectfully disagree. In much the same way that it did in the late 1800s, the Democrat party needs the black vote and, increasingly, the Hispanic vote to pull heavily for their side in order to win elections.

While paying them mere lip service, liberals pass legislation such as a broken welfare system rewarding poor mothers for having out-of-wedlock children and punishing them for getting married, thus keeping minorities at the mercy of government handouts. This makes them beholden to a party that represents views, such as support for abortion and gay marriage, that are diametrically opposed to those of many in the black community.

Democrats know they cannot intellectually compete with a party that, at its core, simply wants to provide individual liberty, encourage strong families and reduce abortions (which equal approximately the death toll of the 9/11 attack every two days in the black community alone), so they continue to repeat the old diatribe that Republicans are the real racists.

The GOP, which was the first to name a black Supreme Court Justice and Secretary of State, must defend itself against accusations based purely in the imagination of Democrats, often with figurative or literal blood on their own hands.

Each February, Democrats promote Black History Month with a vengeance, hoping to stoke the race war embers and elicit even more loyalty from the black community. I would promote a the study of accurate black history, not just during the shortest month but year round, and it's relationship with a Democrat party that has been patronizing at its best and deadly at its worst.

Unfortunately, I feel that would be the only chance Republicans have of attracting a voting bloc that has continually been misled into hating the wrong political party.

NAACP Furthers Mission of KKK

Black Pastors’ ‘Amen; Turning to ‘Oh My!’

Black Pastors Launch Anti-Obama Campaign to Convince African Americans to Withdraw Support for the President

Republicans: Black America's true friend

The Left’s Race Card

Race and Religion in Obamaland…

MLK’s Niece, Dr. Alveda King to Stand (Stood) With Glenn Beck at ‘Restore Honor’ Event in DC and Against Hate and Racism

GB: Liberation Theology… And How It Affects You – Important to Read and Watch!

Beck’s Founders Friday: African-American Founders

A black man: the progressives' perfect Trojan Horse

Is Obama Socially Rigging 2012?

Political Correctness…

Related Reading:

Uncle Sam's Plantation: How Big Government Enslaves America's Poor and What We Can Do About It, Revised and Updated Edition

Bamboozled: How Americans are being Exploited by the Lies of the Liberal Agenda

Liberating Black Theology: The Bible and the Black Experience in America

Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal - America's Racial Obsession

White Guilt

Giants: The Parallel Lives of Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln

Monday, August 17, 2009

Election 2010… Remember

Poll: Majority Leader Reid Vulnerable in 2010

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may be the most powerful Democrat in the upper house, but he's not the most popular politician in his home state of Nevada.

A new poll of likely voters reveals that in a head-to-head race in 2010, Nevada Republican Party Chairwoman Sue Lowden would defeat Reid by 6 percentage points — 48 percent favored Lowden, 42 chose Reid, and 10 percent were undecided.

Lowden has not announced her candidacy, and in fact, the poll was commissioned by Nevada Republicans in an effort to convince her to toss her hat in the ring, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported.

In the poll by Denver-based Vitale and Associates, 44 percent of respondents identified themselves as Democrats, 38 percent said they were Republicans, 15 percent said they were independent, and 3 percent did not state an affiliation.

The poll also disclosed that only 39 percent of respondents had a favorable view of Reid, who was first elected to the Senate in 1986, and just 34 percent said they would vote to re-elect him.

The results of the poll will help encourage Lowden to run, according to Republican strategist Robert Uithoven, who said "there's plenty of support for her."

Nevada's unemployment figure of more than 12 percent is likely contributing to Reid's low approval rating, the Review-Journal observed.

"All of those are very, very telling pieces of information," said pollster Todd Vitale. "I've never seen an incumbent with numbers this bad who hadn't had some scandal."

Interestingly, a Nevada politician who is involved in a scandal has a higher favorable rating than the majority leader.

Republican Sen. John Ensign confessed in June to a nine-month affair with Cindy Hampton, a campaign aide. But the poll showed his favorable rating at 40 percent, 1 percentage point higher than Reid's.

Ensign does not face re-election until 2012.

Gingrich: GOP Could Take House in 2010

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich thinks things could be looking up for the Republicans in the 2010 elections.

He told Fox News Channel's Sean Hannity: "I think there is an outside but growing possibility that you could begin to see Republicans take the House in 2010" because voter dissatisfaction with various Democratic initiatives. "When people get mad over one item, and then they get mad over a second item, and then they get mad over a third item, they build momentum," Gingrich stated.

As for the Democrats in the Senate in 2010, Gingrich told Hannity: "I think it's very hard for them to lose the majority in the Senate, but easy for them to end up with a net loss of three or four [seats]."

That would destroy the Democrats' current 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority.

If they continue on this pattern… who know by 2012? And looking at the next two snippets helps explain why… Not only have many of them (in both house) still not read the Healthcare Bills, even those that are holding Town Halls but

Congressional Junkets 'Rival Club Med'

Members of Congress have been taking advantage of the August recess to head off on overseas junkets — some of them cushier than others.

Senator John McCain made plans to lead a congressional delegation — CODEL for short — of several senators on a junket with stops in hot spots including Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Libya. No spouses signed up to go along. (Good job Senator McCain)

"But for every ‘workhorse CODEL’, there are those that look to rival Club Med," Foreign Policy magazine observed.

Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, scheduled visits to such "trouble spots" as Britain, Greece, Italy, Turkey, and Egypt. Cuellar and four of his five fellow travelers said they would bring their spouses.

Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, planned to lead several House members and their spouses on an around-the-world trip to Ireland, Switzerland, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, China, and Canada.

"But who gets the award for planning what looks to be the cushiest trip?" Foreign Policy asks. "Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill., is scheduled to lead a CODEL to Germany, Italy, and Spain."

Club for Growth: Democrats 'Fail Miserably' on Pork

The anti-tax Club for Growth has released its 2009 "RePork Card" rating House members on their efforts to rein in federal spending, and only one Democrat received a perfect 100 percent rating.

Idaho freshman Rep. Walt Minnick received the perfect rating, meaning he voted for all 68 amendments proposed in the House to strip out earmarks, or "pork," from the 12 spending bills in the first half of 2009.

On the whole, the Democrats "failed miserably," according to Congressional Quarterly's CQ Politics Web site, with an average score of just 3 percent. A total of 202 Democrats received a 0 percent score.

On the Republican side, 21 House members received a perfect 100 rating, and the average score was 57 percent.

"At a time when our national priority ought to be economic growth, House members have been busy stuffing the 2010 appropriations bills with wasteful pork projects," the Club for Growth said in a statement.

Rep. Minnick also had the most independent voting record among House Democrats in the first half of 2009, according to a CQ vote study. He backed the Democratic position only 40 percent of the time in roll call votes pitting most Democrats against most Republicans.

"All of which makes good political sense," CQ Politics observed, "given that the one-time Republican is seeking re-election in one of the country's most conservative states, in a district that voted for Republican John McCain over President Obama 62 percent to 36 percent."

By the way, for those of you who have not braved reading the House Health Care Bill HR-3200 - full report, being pushed by the house leadership, the end is also full of pork. A bill that will “increase the cost of healthcare” by $1.6 Trillion over the next decade… not decrease or even maintain costs, that by most accounts (an opinion that is growing daily), will worsen our healthcare and involve government even more than it is in our lives, and that is causing feverish debates, fear and dissent all over our Country is again packed with pork. :-(

“A people that values its privileges above its principles, soon loses both.”

…Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Source: NewsMax.com

Posted: Daily Thought Pad